Governance Theory and Paradigmatic Progress in Public Administration

Wang Shizong

2010-01-01

Social Sciences in China

Abstract:The half-century long Simon/Waldo debate indicates that the crux of the issue of anomalousness and crisis in the classical paradigm of public administration lies in the politics-administration dichotomy and the resultant separation of value and efficiency.The various schools of public administration emerging since the 1960s have failed to effectively eliminate this anomalousness and crisis.Governance theory,born of globalization,localization and the crisis of the welfare state,breaks through a series of dichotomies including the politics-administration dichotomy in an attempt to bridge the gap between value and efficiency and thereby advance the development of public administration.Some scholars have therefore argued that it has achieved a paradigm revolution in public administration.However,an examination employing Kuhn's paradigm concept suggests that the approbation that governance theory has garnered in public administration circles has come at the cost of metaphysical and belief confusion and a prevailing pragmatism.Profound differences underlie surface agreement.The analysis of governance theory from the perspective of public administration paradigm indicates that such theory should have as its goal the establishment of a unified disciplinary logic and metaphysics and foreshadows a possible path for the emergence of a new paradigm of public administration.