Assessment of Land Use Ecological Risks in Rapidly Developing Regions:A Case Study on Kunshan City
SUN Hongbo,YANG Guishan,ZHU Tianming,SU Weizhong,WAN Rongrong
2010-01-01
Abstract:Based on a traditional ecology risk assessment framework and referring to certain assessment modes of relative risk assessment models abroad, an index system with regard to assessment on land use ecology risks was developed by accounting for three aspects, including the strength of risk sources, the exposure degree of risk receptors and the risk effect. Taking the town as a study unit, an assessment model consisting of the three elements of ecology risks was proposed using the principal component analysis (PCA). Values of the assessment for each unit were obtained by the assessment model, and then comprehensive ecology risk values for each unit were calculated. In addition, the authors performed an analysis on spatial distribution and classification for the three elements of ecology risks and calculated comprehensive ecology risk values. Results are given as follows. First, the highest risk source strength was found to be in Yushan Town which is located in the urban area of Kunshan City. The main reasons for this could be ascribed to the highest strength of industrial pollution emissions and the highest proportion of land for construction. It was suggested that Lujia, Qiandeng, Huaqiao and Zhoushi were towns showing relatively higher values of risk source strength. Zhangpu, Dianshanhu, Bacheng, Zhouzhuang and Jinxi showed relatively lower values of risk source strength since these towns are important tourism regions and grain production areas suffering from relatively lower industrial pollution emissions and having the lowest proportion of land for construction. Second, Bacheng and Zhoushi exhibited the highest values of receptor exposure and the towns having relatively higher values of receptor exposure included Yushan, Zhangpu, Jinxi and Zhouzhuang. Dianshanhu showed a lower value of receptor exposure. Lujia, Qiandeng and Huaqiao showed the lowest values as for receptor exposure. In general, the value for receptor exposure reflects possible risks given the same risk sources. As such, the areas showing higher values of receptor exposure might expose in higher ecology risks. Third, Yushan showed the highest value of risk effect. The towns having higher values of risk effect contained Lujia, Qiandeng, Huaqiao and Zhoushi. Zhanpu, Dianshanhu and Bacheng showed relatively lower values of risk effect and Zhouzhuang and Jinxi showed the lowest ones. It was also found that there exists very high correlation between the value of risk resource and the value of risk effect, showing a correlation coefficient of 0.961. Forth, there existed four types of spatial distribution for the comprehensive ecological risk value in Kunshan. Yushan showed the highest risk zone and relatively higher risk zones included Bacheng, Zhoushi and Lujia. Zhangpu, Qiandeng, Huaqiao and Dianshanhu had relatively lower risk values. Zhouzhuang and Jinxi showed the lowest risk values. Regarding spatial distribution of the comprehensive ecology risk, the values showed a decreasing trend from the north to the south in Kunshan City.