Ecological risk assessment of land use in the area along Changjiang River:a case study of Nanjing,China

SUN Hongbo,YANG Guishan,SU Weizhong,ZHU Tianming,WAN Rongrong
2010-01-01
Acta Ecologica Sinica
Abstract:The ecology risk assessment is currently the advanced concept and method to study the relationship between regional development and eco-environment.The theoretical research on ecology risk assessment is still in its initial phase at present,and the method of ecology risk assessment has not made an important breakthrough.Also,the quantitative expressions of risk sources,risk receptor,assessment endpoint and risk effect are still the key problems in the theoretical system of ecology risk assessment.The previous research of ecology risk assessment mostly focused on biological toxicology and the effect of single chemical pollutant on environment and human health in the 1980s.In the 1990s the effect of contaminants on the ecology system has been the study focus.But since the 21st century,the human activities,such as the land use,urbanization process have become the hot spots of the ecology risk assessment research,and the study scale of risk assessment was enlarged and developed from single population to regional and landscape scale.Both the change of research contents and the extending of research scale reflected the change of thinking and research framework of ecology risk assessment.This view point change from micro to macro scale raised a higher demand to the research idea and method of ecology risk assessment,under this background the comprehensive assessment way is necessary.Based on the improved model of relative ecological risk assessment,the index system of land use ecological risk assessment was built according to the strength of risk sources,the exposure degree of risk receptor and the risk effect.The spatial unit for assessment was the sub-watershed.The paper described and analyzed spatial differentiations of land use ecological risk and impact factors in Nanjing.The results presented a dispersed pattern of the risk value in summary.Firstly,the sub-watersheds with the higher value including Babai River,North slope and south slope rivers of Laoshan and the Shijiu Lake and had higher values both of risk resource strength and risk receptor exposure,but didn′t show high risk effect value.These regions bore high potential ecological risk and we should put the environmental management into practice with emphasis on ecological construction during the process of land use.Secondly,the sub-watersheds of Changzhou Tai lake,Yigan River,Ergan river,Jurong River,middle reaches of Qinhuai River,Jiangning River,Xiangyang River and Gucheng lake with a high risk value possessed middle values of risk resource strength and risk receptor exposure.For these regions we should strengthen the environment management and realize the scientific and intensified land use plan.The sub-watersheds with the low and lower risk value included Maanshan Changjiang river,Baguazhou,Jingan,Qinhuai river,Tangshui river,Chu river,Hengxi river,Niushou river and Qianjin river,which had lower risk resource strength value and risk receptor exposure value and lowest risk effect value.These sub-watersheds mainly were along Changjiang River and at the up reaches of hill rivers.For the areas along Changjiang River in Nanjing the ecology environment quality were effectively guaranteed in recent years.The up reaches of Hill Rivers had high vegetation coverage and weak human impact.For these regions,we should reinforce the maintain of the ecological environment and the intensive use of land.Thirdly,the other sub-watersheds showed middle risk value and we should strengthen the monitoring of ecological environment and prevent the ecological environment from degeneration.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?