Abstract:The different structural properties of proteases and nonproteases are well investigated in this paper. The average percentage PL of residues having a number of long-range contacts greater than or equal to NL(≥NL) for the proteases is larger than that for the nonproteases. The average number of long-range contacts per residue PL,μ in four secondary structure μ (μ=H, E, T, and N) for the proteases is also larger than that for the nonproteases. We calculate the average contact order (CO) per protein, the average long-range order (LRO) per protein, and the average total contact distance (TCD) per protein, and find that the average value of LRO for the nonproteases is smaller than that for the proteases. However, both proteases and nonproteases have the same average values of CO and TCD. The average number of long-range contacts per residue CL for the proteases is larger than that for the nonproteases, however, the average number of short-range contacts per residue CS for the proteases is smaller than that for the nonproteases. It is also shown that the square of radius of gyration for the proteases is relatively smaller than for the nonproteases. This finding implies that proteases are more compact than nonproteases. In protein molecule, each residue has a different ability to form contacts, and in general the number of residues having a small number of contacts is greater than that having a large number of contacts. Here we have concluded that the probability P(n) of amino acid residues having n pairs of contacts in all residues fits a good Gaussian distribution, and there has the same form of Gaussian distribution for 20 amino acid residues. The most probable number of contacts, nC, for the proteases is greater than that for the nonproteases for 20 amino acid residues and one has a good correlation with the Fauchere-Pliska hydrophobicity (FPH) scale. Finally we discuss the relative contribution of amino acid residues involved in cation–π interactions. The higher fraction of cation–π interactions observed in the proteases is found to be reflection of the more general, more frequent occurrence of these interactions in these proteins. All these findings would be helpful for us to understand structural differences between the proteases and other proteins.

CONFIGURATION-DEPENDENT PROPERTIES OF CONTACTS IN( Α/β)8 BARREL PROTEINS

Predicting protein structure from long-range contacts.

Effect of Amino Acid on Forming Residue–residue Contacts in Proteins

Analysis of the Amino Acid Effect on Protein Folding by Atom Pair Contacts

Statistical Interior Properties of Globular Proteins

Analysis of Structural Statistical Properties of Proteases and Nonproteases

Probability Properties of Multi-Contact in Protein Molecules

Rate of Intra-Molecular Contact Formation in Short Two-Dimensional Compact Polymers Chains

Probability of Triple Contacts in Polymer Chains

A Study of Residue-Residue Contacts in Globular Protein Molecules

A Study of the Rate of Intra-Molecular Contact Formation in Protein-Like Polymers

A HNP LATTICE MODEL OF PROTEINS

Conformation Studies of Two-Dimensional Model Molecules of Proteins in the Process of Folding

Structural Statistical Properties of Knotted Proteins

STUDY OF NATIVE CONFORMATIONS AND THERMODYNAMIC PROPERTIES OF TWO-DIMENSIONAL HP COMPACT POLYMERS

Interstrand pairing patterns in $β$-barrel membrane proteins: the positive-outside rule, aromatic rescue, and strand registration prediction

Exploring the Binding Mechanism Between Human Profilin (PFN1) and Polyproline-10 Through Binding Mode Screening

A Survey on Algorithms for Protein Contact Prediction

Contact order revisited: Influence of protein size on the folding rate

Deriving protein dynamical properties from weighted protein contact number.

Effects of Ligand Binding on the Mechanical Stability of Protein GB1 Studied by Steered Molecular Dynamics Simulation