Abstract:The different structural properties of proteases and nonproteases are well investigated in this paper. The average percentage PL of residues having a number of long-range contacts greater than or equal to NL(≥NL) for the proteases is larger than that for the nonproteases. The average number of long-range contacts per residue PL,μ in four secondary structure μ (μ=H, E, T, and N) for the proteases is also larger than that for the nonproteases. We calculate the average contact order (CO) per protein, the average long-range order (LRO) per protein, and the average total contact distance (TCD) per protein, and find that the average value of LRO for the nonproteases is smaller than that for the proteases. However, both proteases and nonproteases have the same average values of CO and TCD. The average number of long-range contacts per residue CL for the proteases is larger than that for the nonproteases, however, the average number of short-range contacts per residue CS for the proteases is smaller than that for the nonproteases. It is also shown that the square of radius of gyration for the proteases is relatively smaller than for the nonproteases. This finding implies that proteases are more compact than nonproteases. In protein molecule, each residue has a different ability to form contacts, and in general the number of residues having a small number of contacts is greater than that having a large number of contacts. Here we have concluded that the probability P(n) of amino acid residues having n pairs of contacts in all residues fits a good Gaussian distribution, and there has the same form of Gaussian distribution for 20 amino acid residues. The most probable number of contacts, nC, for the proteases is greater than that for the nonproteases for 20 amino acid residues and one has a good correlation with the Fauchere-Pliska hydrophobicity (FPH) scale. Finally we discuss the relative contribution of amino acid residues involved in cation–π interactions. The higher fraction of cation–π interactions observed in the proteases is found to be reflection of the more general, more frequent occurrence of these interactions in these proteins. All these findings would be helpful for us to understand structural differences between the proteases and other proteins.

Statistical Interior Properties of Globular Proteins

Predicting protein structure from long-range contacts.

Analysis of the Amino Acid Effect on Protein Folding by Atom Pair Contacts

Effect of Amino Acid on Forming Residue–residue Contacts in Proteins

CONFIGURATION-DEPENDENT PROPERTIES OF CONTACTS IN( Α/β)8 BARREL PROTEINS

Analysis of Structural Statistical Properties of Proteases and Nonproteases

Structural Statistical Properties of Knotted Proteins

A Study of the Rate of Intra-Molecular Contact Formation in Protein-Like Polymers

A Study of Residue-Residue Contacts in Globular Protein Molecules

Rate of Intra-Molecular Contact Formation in Short Two-Dimensional Compact Polymers Chains

Conformation Studies of Two-Dimensional Model Molecules of Proteins in the Process of Folding

A STUDY OF FOLDING SEQUENCE OF TWO-DIMENSIONAL COMPACT PROTEINS

Probability Properties of Multi-Contact in Protein Molecules

A HNP LATTICE MODEL OF PROTEINS

Protein contact networks at different length scales and role of hydrophobic, hydrophilic and charged residues in protein's structural organisation

Topological features of proteins from amino acid residue networks

Local densities orthogonal to beta-sheet amide planes: patterns of packing in globular proteins.

Geometric structures of proteins for understanding folding , discriminating natives and predicting biochemical functions

Spatial organization of hydrophobic and charged residues affects protein thermal stability and binding affinity

Geometrical and Sequence Characteristics of α-Helices in Globular Proteins