Abstract:BiopolymersVolume 45, Issue 1 p. 35-49 Folding type-specific secondary structure propensities of amino acids, derived from α-helical, β-sheet, α/β, and α+β proteins of known structures Bo Jiang, Corresponding Author Bo Jiang Department of Biological, Sciences, and Biotechnology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P.R. ChinaSchool of Economics, Peking University, 100871, P.R. ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorTao Guo, Tao Guo Department of Biological, Sciences, and Biotechnology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P.R. ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorLei-Wei Peng, Lei-Wei Peng Department of Biological, Sciences, and Biotechnology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P.R. ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorZhi-Rong Sun, Zhi-Rong Sun Department of Biological, Sciences, and Biotechnology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P.R. ChinaSearch for more papers by this author Bo Jiang, Corresponding Author Bo Jiang Department of Biological, Sciences, and Biotechnology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P.R. ChinaSchool of Economics, Peking University, 100871, P.R. ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorTao Guo, Tao Guo Department of Biological, Sciences, and Biotechnology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P.R. ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorLei-Wei Peng, Lei-Wei Peng Department of Biological, Sciences, and Biotechnology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P.R. ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorZhi-Rong Sun, Zhi-Rong Sun Department of Biological, Sciences, and Biotechnology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P.R. ChinaSearch for more papers by this author First published: 06 December 1998 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0282(199801)45:1<35::AID-BIP4>3.0.CO;2-%23Citations: 16AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Abstract Folding type-specific secondary structure propensities of 20 naturally occurring amino acids have been derived from α-helical, β-sheet, α/β, and α+β proteins of known structures. These data show that each residue type of amino acids has intrinsic propensities in different regions of secondary structures for different folding types of proteins. Each of the folding types shows markedly different rank ordering, indicating folding type-specific effects on the secondary structure propensities of amino acids. Rigorous statistical tests have been made to validate the folding type-specific effects. It should be noted that α and β proteins have relatively small α-helices and β-strands forming propensities respectively compared with those of α+β and α/β proteins. This may suggest that, with more complex architectures than α and β proteins, α+β and α/β proteins require larger propensities to distinguish from interacting α-helices and β-strands. Our finding of folding type-specific secondary structure propensities suggests that sequence space accessible to each folding type may have differing features. Differing sequence space features might be constrained by topological requirement for each of the folding types. Almost all strong β-sheet forming residues are hydrophobic in character regardless of folding types, thus suggesting the hydrophobicities of side chains as a key determinant of β-sheet structures. In contrast, conformational entropy of side chains is a major determinant of the helical propensities of amino acids, although other interactions such as hydrophobicities and charged interactions cannot be neglected. These results will be helpful to protein design, class-based secondary structure prediction, and protein folding. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Biopoly 45: 35–49, 1998 Citing Literature Volume45, Issue1January 1998Pages 35-49 RelatedInformation

Analysis of the Amino Acid Effect on Protein Folding by Atom Pair Contacts

Effect of Amino Acid on Forming Residue–residue Contacts in Proteins

Predicting protein structure from long-range contacts.

CONFIGURATION-DEPENDENT PROPERTIES OF CONTACTS IN( Α/β)8 BARREL PROTEINS

Analysis of Structural Statistical Properties of Proteases and Nonproteases

Statistical Interior Properties of Globular Proteins

Rate of Intra-Molecular Contact Formation in Short Two-Dimensional Compact Polymers Chains

Folding rate prediction using -order contact distance for proteins with two- and three-state folding kinetics

A Study of the Rate of Intra-Molecular Contact Formation in Protein-Like Polymers

Conformation Studies of Two-Dimensional Model Molecules of Proteins in the Process of Folding

A HNP LATTICE MODEL OF PROTEINS

A STUDY OF FOLDING SEQUENCE OF TWO-DIMENSIONAL COMPACT PROTEINS

Probing Possible Downhill Folding: Native Contact Topology Likely Places a Significant Constraint on the Folding Cooperativity of Proteins with ∼40 Residues

Direct Correlation Between Proteins' Folding Rates and Their Amino Acid Compositions: an Ab Initio Folding Rate Prediction

The Folding Transition State of Protein L is Extensive with Nonnative Interactions (and Not Small and Polarized)

Contact order revisited: Influence of protein size on the folding rate

Predicting Protein Folding Types by Distance Functions That Make Allowances for Amino Acid Interactions.

Predicting Protein Folding Rates from Geometric Contact and Amino Acid Sequence

A Study of Residue-Residue Contacts in Globular Protein Molecules

Folding type-specific secondary structure propensities of amino acids, derived from alpha-helical, beta-sheet, alpha/beta, and alpha+beta proteins of known structures

Folding Type‐specific Secondary Structure Propensities of Amino Acids, Derived from Α‐helical, Β‐sheet, Α/β, and Α+β Proteins of Known Structures