The impact of the respondents' conflict of interests on the hospital management survey results

Ruya GUO,lixia DOU,Yifei ZHAO,Shenshen LI,Yangfeng WU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-0592.2015.07.009
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To explore the impact of the respondents' conflict of interests on the hospital management survey results. Methods: Information which came from the study of Acute Coronary Syndrome Clinical Pathways Ⅲ and its hospital management sub-study, including 81 hospitals and 4996 ACS patients were analyzed, in which, all the questions that were administrated to more than 2 persons with different roles in the hospitals were selected and compared their answers to the same questions. Furtherly, the relationship of the answers with risk of in-hospital MACE were analyzed. Results: For 4 of the 10 questions analyzed, significant difference in the answers was found between different roles(P<0.05). Further, for these 4 questions, one of the respondents had showed apparent conflict of interest on the question, the others didn't. The one who had conflict of interest showed that the risk of in-hospital MACE for patients in the group with affirmative answers was higher than those in the group with negative answer (OR> 1), which did not meet the common sense; those without conflict of interest showed that the risk of in-hospital MACE for patients in the group with affirmative answers was lower than that with negative answer (OR <1), consistent with common sense. Conclusion: When respondents are asked questions with potential conflict of interest, the survey results will be distorted. So we should selected respondents with no conflict of interest to answer the question, or choose an objective source of information to avoid such bias.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?