Consensus and disagreement of evaluating public interest of public medical institutions from the point of view of the consultant

HU Xian-zhi,CHEN Ying-yao,LIANG Fei,GU Qian,KE Xiong,DENG Wei,ZHAO Lie-bin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-2982.2012.11.006
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To analyze consensus and differences of evaluating public interest of public medical institutions from the point of view of the consultants who are in various backgrounds. Methods:Consulting to 29 experts including researchers from universities and research institutions, health officials, public hospital administrators and social groups representative and patients. Result:Different experts hold different opinions on giving priority to fairness and accessibility or quality priority when evaluating public interest of public medical institutions, there are also different views by few conclutants on secondary indicators weight. Conclusion:Improving and enhancing public interest of public medical institutions lies on reducing and eliminating the cognitive differences of public interest within government, public medical institutions and patients, as well as ensuring responsibilities of the parties.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?