Application of Multidimensional Quality Management Tools in the Management of Medical Adverse Events
Bei Yuan,Shibei Song,Xiao Tang,Zhanqiang Ma
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/rmhp.s436083
2024-01-10
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Abstract:Bei Yuan, Shibei Song, Xiao Tang, Zhanqiang Ma Medical Department, The Second People's Hospital of Guizhou Province (Guizhou Province Mental Health Center), Guizhou, Guiyang, 550001, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Zhanqiang Ma, Medical Department, The Second People's Hospital of Guizhou Province (Guizhou Province Mental Health Center), Guizhou, Guiyang, 550001, People's Republic of China, Tel +86-13017432067, Email Purpose: This study aims to investigate the impact of multidimensional quality management tools in establishing a medical adverse event management system, with the aim of continuously improving medical quality and safety while ensuring patient well-being. Methods: This study introduces risk management theories, such as the "Gray Rhino Theory", and employs quality management tools like the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle, Quality Control Circle (QCC), and Root Cause Analysis (RCA), to provide relevant quality management education and training to employees. This approach facilitates the establishment of a medical adverse event management system that encourages reporting and fosters a blame-free reporting culture, while simultaneously implementing quality management across the entire process. The regular utilization of the QCC facilitates ongoing quality improvement. Furthermore, for sentinel events and patient harm incidents with educational values, the study employs the Incident Decision Tree (IDT) to determine appropriate actions. Additionally, the hospital initiates RCA for system-wide improvements, focusing on areas such as management, institutional processes, and environmental aspects. Moreover, an internal medical quality improvement case competition is organized, with outstanding cases being selected to participate in the multidimensional quality management competition organized by the National Quality Management Alliance. Results: The study reveals a significant improvement in employees' awareness of adverse events, the percentage of employees reporting adverse events increased significantly from 39.15% in 2019 to 49.77% in 2022, P=0.002. Furthermore, the adverse event reporting rate has risen significantly from 2.78% (2019) to 5.96% (2022), P=0.002. Additionally, each department has been able to utilize QCC or RCA tools for quality improvement, thereby further reinforcing the development of a patient safety culture. Conclusion: Multidimensional quality management tools play a crucial role in establishing a hospital's adverse event management system, promoting continuous improvement in medical quality, ensuring patient safety, and effectively implementing a culture of patient safety. Keywords: multidimensional quality management tools, adverse events, management system, patient safety Patient Safety Culture (PSC) denotes a collective behavioral pattern within an organization, where members share common values and behaviors aimed at minimizing harm to patients through ongoing education, training, and process optimization. 1 In both 2021 and 2022, the National Health Commission of China issued documentation for "Goals for Improving Medical Quality and Safety", which emphasized the objective of increasing the reporting rate of adverse events. This underscores the significance of patient safety as a critical challenge in the medical services domain, garnering considerable attention at the national level. To address this, embracing modern hospital quality management concepts and establishing a scientific adverse event management system, fostering proactive reporting, and adopting a non-punitive approach holds immense importance in enhancing medical quality, boosting patient satisfaction, and ensuring patient safety. The current understanding of PSC in the healthcare system, as well as the tools that have been utilized for the evaluation of PSC is limited. 2 An inappropriate medical practical could lead to disability or even death to patients. 3 Currently, several instruments commonly used for the evaluation of PSC in a hospital scenario, including the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSPSC), 4 the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ), 5 the Patient Safety Climate in Health Care Organizations (PSCHO), 6 the Modified Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (MSHAQ), 7 and the Scottish Hospital Safety Questionnaire (SHSQ). 8 However, considering the differences in beliefs, attitudes, norms, and values between China and other countries, a Chinese version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HOSPSC) may be more suitable for our study. 9 Apart from the suitable instrument, education on PSC is also important. Ziema et al showed that patient safety education remained the priority for medical wor -Abstract Truncated-
health care sciences & services,health policy & services