Abstract:BACKGROUND: Medical device adverse event reporting is an essential activity for mitigating device-related risks. Reporting of adverse events can be done by anyone like healthcare workers, patients, and others. However, for an individual to determine the reporting, he or she should recognize the current situation as an adverse event. The objective of this report is to share observed individual differences in the perception of a medical device adverse event, which may affect the judgment and the reporting of adverse events.METHODS: We trained twenty-three participants from twelve Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) member economies about international guidelines for medical device vigilance. We developed and used six virtual cases and six questions. We divided participants into six groups and compared their opinions. We also surveyed the country's opinion to investigate the beginning point of 'patient use'. The phases of 'patient use' are divided into: 1) inspecting, 2) preparing, and 3) applying medical device.RESULTS: As for the question on the beginning point of 'patient use,' 28.6%, 35.7%, and 35.7% of participants provided answers regarding the first, second, and third phases, respectively. In training for applying international guidelines to virtual cases, only one of the six questions reached a consensus between the two groups in all six virtual cases. For the other five questions, different judgments were given in at least two groups.CONCLUSION: From training courses using virtual cases, we found that there was no consensus on 'patient use' point of view of medical devices. There was a significant difference in applying definitions of adverse events written in guidelines regarding the medical device associated incidents. Our results point out that international harmonization effort is needed not only to harmonize differences in regulations between countries but also to overcome diversity in perspectives existing at the site of medical device use.

Relationship Between Medical Device Adverse Event Reporting and Hospital Medical Ethics

Comparative Study on Monitoring System of Medical Device Adverse Events in America, European Union and China

[Analysis on Evaluation of Medical Device Adverse Events Monitoring and Some Factors Influencing MDAE's Reporting by Medical Personnels].

Discussion on relation to harmonious hospital patient relationship and construction of medical professional ethics in teaching hospital

Differences in Perspectives of Medical Device Adverse Events: Observational Results in Training Program Using Virtual Cases

The Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring in Hospitals

Optimization of Monitoring and Reporting System of Adverse Drug Reaction in Medical Organizations

Ethics Committee' s Management of Noncompliance/Violation or Protocol Deviation Report in Clinical Research

Improving Patient Safety Through Collaboration Between Clinical Staff and Engineering Staff in Hospitals

The Current Problems of Regulation of Medical Devices and Countermeasures

Discussion on New Strategies for Management of Medical Devices in Hospital

Research on Evaluation Method for MDRs'quality

[Better medical devices regulations for better health care: enlightenment for medical devices regulatory reform in China, from experiences of the E.U. and the U.S.A]

Ethical Thinking on Enhancing Management in Medical Safety

Survey on the ethics review in Shanghai Hospital Ethics Committee

Barriers in reporting adverse effects of medical devices: a literature review

Common issues and improvements on clinical trial data inspection of medical device

Discussion on the Development of Hospital Ethics Committee

Influence Factors and Countermeasures of Patient Safety Events Reporting

Ethical Reflection on Medical Scientific Research

[The current situation review of medical device risk management]