Abstract:Introduction The EU Medical Device Regulation 2017/745 (MDR; article 87) requires device manufacturers to report to the relevant authorities any serious incident and any corrective action undertaken, through Field Safety Notices (FSN) whose content must be consistent in all Member States. Before MDR, due to the lack of harmonized global standards for reporting, FSNs were published independently by each country with different formats, styles, nomenclatures and languages. This heterogeneity makes it challenging to use such historical data for trend analysis in post-market surveillance (PMS). Purpose 1) To assess the quality of the FSNs issued by EU or non-EU national authorities for analysing historical trends. 2) To group countries based on such quality, and test for differences between EU and non-EU countries. Methods As part of the CORE-MD project coordinated by the ESC, all FSN information publicly available as HTML text (excluding linked PDFs) was retrieved automatically from national authorities' websites, using the CORE-MD PMS tool [1]. For each FSN, a score was assigned to each field of interest (1 or 2, according to importance for building trends) (see Figure 1), and a Percentage Score (PS) computed as the % of the ratio between the scores' sum and the maximum possible score (10). Based on PS, FSNs were categorized as Excellent (≥90), Very Good (80≤PS<90), Good (70≤PS<80), Medium (60≤PS<70), or Unqualified (<60). For each country, the distribution of FSN categories was computed. Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering (HAC) was used to group countries based on their similarities, and differences between EU and non-EU countries were assessed by Mann-Whitney U test. Results 126,405 FSNs published before 31/12/2022 were retrieved and analyzed. The % of FSN in which each field was available is shown by country in Figure 1. Manufacturer and Device were clearly described, but more detailed device information was often absent. The Description, with the reason for publishing the FSN, and the Device Category, allowing nomenclature categorization, were provided only by a few countries. The % of FSNs in each quality category is reported in Figure 2: only Italy provided some FSNs (31%) classified as Excellent. The HAC analysis identified three clusters: "high-quality FSNs" (Czechia, Denmark, Italy, Sweden, the Netherlands, and the USA), "moderate-quality FSNs" (Australia, Canada, Greece, Ireland, Latvia, Slovenia, Spain, and the UK), and "low-quality FSNs" (Croatia, Estonia, France, Germany, Poland, and Portugal). There was no difference between EU and non-EU countries. Conclusions A significant discrepancy was observed in the quality of FSNs retrieved from different countries, highlighting the difficulty in using such data to analyse trends, for example in reports of cardiovascular devices. This study reinforces the need for a global minimum reporting standard, to facilitate more effective PMS.Figure 1Figure 2

Research on Evaluation Method for MDRs'quality

[Analysis on Evaluation of Medical Device Adverse Events Monitoring and Some Factors Influencing MDAE's Reporting by Medical Personnels].

The Creation of the Evaluation System of Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring Quality

Monitoring Evaluation and Results Analysis of High-Risk Medical Equipment

A Computational Method to Quantitatively Measure Pediatric Drug Safety Using Electronic Medical Records

The Investigation of Quality Management Methods of Electronic Medical Record

Research on Quality Effect Evaluation of Medical Device Management in Shanghai Based on Radar Chart Method

Quality of Adverse Drug Reaction Reports Submitted by Health Care Professionals in Xi'an

Quality Analysis of the Adverse Drug Reactions Reports from Shanghai Healthcare Professionals

Assessment of methodology and report quality of systematic evaluation and meta-analysis of acupuncture-moxibustion in China]

The Quality of Spontaneous Adverse Drug Reaction Reports in China: A Descriptive Study.

Development of a quality instrument for assessing the spontaneous reports of ADR/ADE using Delphi method in China

The quality of spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports from the pharmacovigilance centre in western China.

A Study On The Function Of Medical Device Postmarket Monitoring Technical System In China

Research on the Practice of Quality Monitoring Methods of Internal Work of Medical Records Department

Comparative Study on Monitoring System of Medical Device Adverse Events in America, European Union and China

Empirical Research of Quality Evaluation Indicator System of ADR/ADE Case

Study on the Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Entities in Jiangsu Province and Guangdong Province

Research on approach and practice of overall medical equipment quality control testing

Quality evaluation of field safety notices of medical devices, across EU and non-EU countries

The Survey of Healthcare Professionals on Awareness for Medical Device Administration Events Monitoring