Abstract:Introduction: Clinical research is vital in the discovery of new medical knowledge and reducing disease risk in humans. In clinical research poor data quality is one of the major problems, affecting data integrity and the generalisability of the research findings. To achieve high quality data, guidance needs to be provided to clinical studies on the collection, processing and handling of data. However, clinical trials are implementing ad hoc, pragmatic approaches to ensure data quality. This study aims to explore the procedures for ensuring data quality in Australian clinical research studies. Material and methods: We conducted a national cross-sectional, mixed-mode multi-contact (postal letter and e-mail) web-based survey of clinical researchers associated with clinical studies listed on the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry. Results: Of the 3689 clinical studies contacted, 589 (16%) responded, 570 (97%) consented and 441 (77%) completed the survey. 67% clinical studies reported following national and/or international guidelines for data monitoring, with the National Statement (86%) and Good Clinical Practice Guidelines (55%) most common. Source data were most likely to be recorded on one instrument (46%), of which paper (77%) being most common. 46.4% studies did not use data management software and 55% monitored data via traditional approaches (e.g. source data verification). Training on data quality was only provided to less than half of the staff responsible for data entry (43.9%) and data monitoring (37.5%). Regression analysis on 179 (33%) respondents found a borderline significant association between intervention trials and a definition for protocol deviation and/or violation (odds 3.065, p = 0.096). This may suggest when clinical trials are provided with additional guidance and resources, they are more likely to implement required procedures. Statistical strength of the full regression model was not significant χ2 (13, 179) = 15.827, p = 0.259. Conclusion: Small single-site academic clinical studies implemented ad hoc procedures to ensure data quality. Education and training are required to promote standardised practices to ensure data quality in small scale clinical trials.

Data Management and Quality Control of the Large-Scale Epidemiological Survey Study

Quality Control of Survey and Coding in Large-Scale Epidemiological Study

Electronic data quality control strategy in clinical research

Quality control of multicenter nursing investigation research

Quality Assurance of Disease Control Agency Laboratory in Chengde City

PDB4 Conduct Outcomes Research in China - Addressing Challenges in Data Quality Control

Improving the Quality of the Data in the Medical Record Management System

[Method of Double Data Entry and Quality Control by REDCap System].

Practical Skills for Statistical Analysis of Medical Quality Control Data with the Software EXCEL

Big Data and Clinical Research: Focusing on the Area of Critical Care Medicine in Mainland China.

[Application of Electronic Data Acquisition System REDCap in Large Natural Population-Based Cohort Studies].

[Study on construction and application of technology system of chronic diseases and risk factor surveillance in China]

Quality control of triage in diagnostic procedure for emergency intelligent triage system

The Investigation of Quality Management Methods of Electronic Medical Record

Survey of a Study on the Real-Time Control of Medical Quality in Hospitals

Application of a four-dimensional framework to evaluate the quality of the HIV/AIDS data collection process in China

Quality assurance of integrative big data for medical research within a multihospital system

Heterogeneity in clinical research data quality monitoring: A national survey

[Construction of Natural Population Cohort on Telephone Follow-Up Management Quality Control System and Discussion Regarding Critical Issues by REDCap System].

On the Quality Control of the Scanning of the Paper Medical Records

Research and Application of Quantitative Evaluation Method on Data Quality of Medical Record Front Sheet