Quality Analysis of the Adverse Drug Reactions Reports from Shanghai Healthcare Professionals

SHEN Jian-wen,WANG Da-you,ZHANG Liang,QIU Xiao-yan,ZHONG Ming-kang,DU Wen-min,XU Jian-long,MAO Ye-meng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-8629.2009.05.008
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective To study the voluntary reports of adverse drug reaction(ADR) reported by different healthcare professionals and their cognition to the ADR reporting system.Methods Reports submitted by doctors,pharmacists and nurses from Shanghai ADR database in 2006 and 2007 were imported to ACCESS and statistic by EXCEL and analyze the quality of the ADR reports.Results The portion of reports from doctors is 65.87%,higher than those from pharmacists(26.13 %) and nurses(8.00 %).More than 99% of ADR reports achieved documentation grade 3 according to the documentation grading scheme developed by WHO and China.There are still some missing essential information elements in the reports,such as medical records(loss rate >10%) and the way of contacts(loss rate>5%).The portions of new and serious ADR in the reports of doctors,pharmacists and nurses are 3.54%,4.20%,5.85% in 2006,and 5.55%,6.33%,12.28% in 2007 respectively.The highest proportion of ADR reports in which reporters' causality assessments in line with center' was found in nurse.Conclusion The quality of ADR reports by healthcare professionals are diverse in level and view due to the professional backgrounds.To improve the efficiency of ADR monitoring,we should encourage all professional medical staff for their contribution.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?