Effect of Medical Background Differences on Reports of Adverse Drug Reactions

Shen Jianwen,Wang Dayou,Zhang Liang,Qiu Xiaoyan,Xu Jianlong,Du Wenmin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-0698.2008.06.008
2008-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To study the influence of background differences in medical staff on voluntary reports of adverse drug reactions(ADR),and to provide theoretical bases for the expansion of ADR monitoring and the quality improvement. Method:The ADR reports from Shanghai ADR database in 2006 were analyzed.Result:The proportion of the reports from doctors was 66.06%,higher than that from nurses(25.93%)and pharmacists(8.00%).The reports on hepatobiliary system damages reached 1.13%and 0.86%in those from doctors and pharmacists,while no such reports came from nurses.The reports of anti-bacterial drugs accounted for about 60%of the total.In particular,2.64%of the reports from doctors related with anti-mycobactierium agents,ranking fifth,were higher than those from pharmacists and nurses(0.31%and 0.41%).The average latent periods in the ADR reports from doctors,pharmacists and nurses were 9,7 and 2 days.Conclusion:The ADR reports have their own professional characteristics.The ADR reports by distinct medical professions are diverse in levels due to their professional backgrounds and views.In the process of the identification and recognition of ADRs,physicians pay more attention to the indication of characteristics of drug-induced reactions,physical examinations and laboratory diagnostic tests,pharmacists are more concerned about pharmacological actions of medicines, whereas nurses care more about time clues.To improve the efficiency of ADR monitoring,we should encourage all professional medical staff for their contribution.We should appropriately estimate the data from the voluntary reporting system and use them carefully and scientifically.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?