Abstract:BACKGROUND. Abbreviated protocols could allow wider adoption of MRI in patients undergoing breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). However, abbreviated MRI has been explored primarily in screening settings. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article was to compare diagnostic performance of abbreviated MRI and full-protocol MRI for evaluation of breast cancer NAC response, stratifying by radiologists' breast imaging expertise. METHODS. This retrospective study included 203 patients with breast cancer (mean age, 52.1 ± 11.2 [SD] years) from two hospitals who underwent MRI before NAC initiation and after NAC completion before surgical resection from March 2017 to April 2021. Abbreviated MRI was extracted from full-protocol MRI and included the axial T2-weighted sequence and precontrast and single early postcontrast T1-weighted sequences. Three general radiologists and three breast radiologists independently interpreted abbreviated and full-protocol MRI in separate sessions, identifying enhancing lesions to indicate residual tumor and measuring lesion size. The reference standard was presence and size of residual tumor on pathologic assessment of post-NAC surgical specimens. RESULTS. A total of 50 of 203 patients had pathologic complete response (pCR). Intraobserver and interobserver agreement for abbreviated and full-protocol MRI for general and breast radiologists ranged from substantial to nearly perfect (κ = 0.70-0.81). Abbreviated MRI compared with full-protocol MRI showed no significant difference for general radiologists in sensitivity (54.7% vs 57.3%, p > .99), specificity (92.8% vs 95.6%, p = .29), or accuracy (83.4% vs 86.2%, p = .30), nor for breast radiologists in sensitivity (60.0% vs 61.3%, p > .99), specificity (94.6% vs 97.4%, p = .22), or accuracy (86.0% vs 88.5%, p = .30). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were not significantly different between protocols for any reader individually (p > .05). Mean difference in residual tumor size on MRI relative to pathology for abbreviated protocol ranged for general radiologists from -0.19 to 0.03 mm and for breast radiologists from -0.15 to -0.05 mm, and for full protocol ranged for general radiologists from 0.57 to 0.65 mm and for breast radiologists from 0.66 to 0.79 mm. CONCLUSION. Abbreviated compared with full-protocol MRI showed similar intraobserver and interobserver agreement and no significant difference in diagnostic performance. Full-protocol MRI but not abbreviated MRI slightly overestimated pathologic tumor sizes. CLINICAL IMPACT. Abbreviated protocols may facilitate use of MRI for post-NAC response assessment by general and breast radiologists.

A Study of a Breast MRI Abbreviated Protocol for Breast Neoplasm Screening

Characterization of common breast MRI abnormalities: comparison between abbreviated and full MRI protocols

Abbreviated Versus Full-Protocol MRI for Breast Cancer Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response Assessment: Diagnostic Performance by General and Breast Radiologists.

A Concise Review on the Utilization of Abbreviated Protocol Breast MRI over Full Diagnostic Protocol in Breast Cancer Detection

The diagnostic value of abbreviated MRI protocol in the surveillance of Branch-Duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm

Comparative Diagnostic Efficacy of Abbreviated and Full Protocol Breast MRI: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis

Comparison of Diagnostic Performance between Classic and Modified Abbreviated Breast MRI and the MRI Features Affecting Their Diagnostic Performance

Abbreviated MRI Protocols for the Abdomen.

Comparison of the diagnostic efficiency for breast cancer in Chinese women using mammography, ultrasound, MRI, and different combinations of these imaging modalities.

Retrospective analysis of the utility of multiparametric MRI for differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions in women in China

Performance Evaluation of Breast Cancer Diagnosis with Mammography, Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Comparative study of full-field digital mammography and MRI in breast cancers

Performance Comparison of Conventional Imaging Methods for Adjunctive Diagnosis of Breast Cancer

Utility of abbreviated MRI in the post-treatment evaluation of rectal cancer

Comparatire study of enhanced MRI with combined non-enhanced MRI sequences in screening of breast lesions

Comparison of the Diagnostic Values of Dynamic Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, and Digital Mammography for Early Breast Cancer

Screening Breast MRI Primer: Indications, Current Protocols, and Emerging Techniques

Abbreviated breast MRI or digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer detection in dense breasts? A retrospective preliminary study with comparable results

The Diagnostic Value of Dedicated Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Cancer: Comparative Study with Digital Mammography and Ultrasound

The Diagnostic Value of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Non-Calcified Malignant Breast Lesions Showed on Mammography: Comparison with Histopathology

Study on the Effectiveness of Application of Multi-Sequence MRI in Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions