Intraoperative electron beam intercomparison of 6 sites using mailed thermoluminescence dosimetry: Absolute dose and energy
Wim Dries,Anna Petoukhova,Nicolas Hertsens,Piet Stevens,Valerie Jarbinet,Cathryn Huibregtse Bimmel-Nagel,Jan Weterings,Ko van Wingerden,Charlotte Bauwens,Verdi Vanreusel,Stéphane Simon
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103302
IF: 3.119
2024-02-05
Physica Medica
Abstract:Purpose In 2018, the Netherlands Commission on Radiation Dosimetry subcommittee on IORT initiated a limited intercomparison of electron IORT (IOERT) in Belgium and The Netherlands. The participating institutions have enough variability in age, type of equipment, and in dose calibration protocols. Methods In this study, three types of IOERT-dedicated mobile accelerators were represented: Mobetron 2000, LIAC HWL and LIAC. Mobetron produces electron beams with energies of 6, 9 and 12 MeV, while LIAC HWL and LIAC can deliver 6, 8, 10 and 12 MeV electron beams. For all energies, the reference beam (10 cm diameter, 0° incidence) and 5 cm diameter beams were measured, as these smaller beams are used more frequently in clinic. The mailed TLD service from the Radiation Dosimetry Services (RDS, Houston, USA) has been used. Following RDS' standard procedures, each beam was irradiated to 300 cGy at d max with TLDs around d max and around depth of 50 % dose (R50). Absolute dose at 100 % and beam energy, expressed as R50, could be verified in this way. Results All absolute doses and energies under reference conditions were well within RDS-stated uncertainties: dose deviations were <5 % and deviations in R50 were <5 mm. For the small 5 cm beams, all results were also within acceptance levels except one absolute dose value. Deviations were not significantly dependent on manufacturer, energy, diameter and calibration protocol. Conclusions All absolute dose values, except one of a non-reference beam, and all energy values were well within the measurement accuracy of RDS TLDs.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging