Abstract:Background In 2021, a Technical Meeting was hosted by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) where it was recommended that a standardized method for assessing the accuracy of film dose calculations should be established. Purpose To design an audit that evaluates the accuracy of film dosimetry processes. To propose a framework for identifying out‐of‐tolerance results and to perform an international pilot study to test the audit design. Methods Six members of an international Dosimetry Audit Network (DAN) developed an audit for radiochromic film dosimetry. A single host center provided the materials to each participating DAN member to conduct the audits. Materials included: (1) a set of two irradiated audit films (10 Sq: 10 cm × 10 cm, 15 Sq: 15 cm × 15 cm), (2) a reference calibration film set, and (3) a blank sheet of film. The participants were blinded to the dose and tasked with producing dose maps using their standard film dosimetry process. Average Region‐Of‐Interest (ROI: 2 cm × 2 cm) dose was measured from the dose maps and compared to the known dose. In the audit, all participants used their local scanning and software protocols. Film calibration was performed in two distinct ways: (1) using a calibration film set which was provided by the host center and (2) using a calibration film set which was locally irradiated. Several variations of the audit were also performed to examine how scanning and software processing can affect film dosimetry results. In the first variation of the audit (VariantA), a set of film scans was processed using five different software solutions. In the second variation of the audit (VariantB), all films were scanned on the same scanner and processed using two in‐house software solutions. Results Taking one film scan from each participant, the standard deviations (1σ) (SD) in the dose returned from the host calibration and returned from the local calibration were ±7.2% and ±6.5% respectively, with variations from −12.4% to 12.9% of the known dose. The larger dose variations in the data set were attributed to the corrections applied for variations in scanner brightness during processing and incorrectly assigned calibration doses. When the raw image data set was processed by an expert user of each software solution (VariantA) the SDs were ±2.7% and ±3.7% for in‐house and vendor‐based software, respectively. When the films were scanned on a single scanner and processed with the two in‐house software solutions (VariantB) the results had a SD of ±2.3%. Conclusions An audit has been designed and tested for radiotherapy film dosimetry at an international level. A framework for diagnosing issues within a film dosimetry process has been proposed that could be used to audit centers that use film as a dosimeter. Incorporating quality assurance throughout the film process is important in obtaining accurate and consistent film dosimetry. A better understanding of vendor‐based software systems is necessary for users to process accurate and consistent film dosimetry.

IAEA/WHO postal dosimetry audit methodology for electron beams using radio photoluminescent dosimeters

An efficient protocol for commissioning radiophotoluminescence dosimeters for radiotherapy dosimetry audits

The IAEA remote audit of small field dosimetry for testing the implementation of the TRS‐483 code of practice

An external dosimetry audit programme to credential static and rotational IMRT delivery for clinical trials quality assurance

Alanine/EPR dosimetry for mailed intercomparison at ocular proton therapy facilities-preliminary results for three centres for irradaitions at CCB IFJ PAN eyeline

An international film dosimetry intercomparison to establish a multi‐center audit framework

National pilot-study on verification of calculated absorbed dose distribution to be delivered in advanced radiotherapy treatment

A virtual audit system for intensity-modulated radiation therapy credentialing in Japan Clinical Oncology Group clinical trials: A pilot study

Challenges for the Implementation of Primary Standard Dosimetry in Proton Minibeam Radiation Therapy

A system for mailed dosimetric audits of 192 Ir and 60 Co HDR brachytherapy combining OSLD and radiochromic film

Phenomena observed in electron EBRT using a pulse-by-pulse Radioluminescence dosimetry system with cloud-based analytics

Development of methodology for quality audit of doses in target area and organ at risk and two dimensional dose distribution in intensity modulated radiotherapy

Dosimetric impact of calibration coefficients determined using linear accelerator photon and electron beams for ionization chamber in an on-site dosimetry audit

Relative Sensitivities and Correlation of Factors Introducing Uncertainty in Radiotherapy Dosimetry Audits

Intraoperative electron beam intercomparison of 6 sites using mailed thermoluminescence dosimetry: Absolute dose and energy

Development of methodology for dose quality audit of multi-leaf collimator in intensity modulated radiotherapy

Evaluation of radiophotoluminescent glass dosimeter response for therapeutic spot scanning proton beam: suggestion of linear energy transfer‐based correction

A multicenter study of modified electron beam output calibration

Clinical applicability of Linac-integrated CBCT based NIPAM 3D dosimetry: a dual-institutional investigation

Measuring dose in lung identifies peripheral tumour dose inaccuracy in SBRT audit

Dosimetry of ultra-high dose rate electron beams using thermoluminescence and optically stimulated luminescence detectors