Abstract:To the Editor: In former times, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) individualized its treatment protocol or clinical practice without considering the principles of modern medicine. The standard methodology of random selection, blinding and placebo control, followed by statistical analysis was generally overlooked. This had a negative effect on the development of TCM. Recently, the volume of applied research in Chinese medicine is growing rapidly and the quality is improving.1 There is good evidence supporting the use of some Chinese patent medicine treatments.2–4 Further, there is a more open attitude to Chinese medicine among conventional health professionals, partly explained by the rise of evidence-based medicine (EBM). Changes are occurring in the clinical research of TCM. Firstly, researchers are starting to emphasize the importance of clinical trials.5 Many experts including clinicians, pharmacologists, statisticians and epidemiologists are discussing and formulating clinical trial protocols for TCM. Secondly, quality control is being emphasized for the process of trials more than before.6 Thirdly, clinical researchers and journal editors are moving to accept CONSORT for TCM with the help of the support of EBM experts.7 Lastly, some experts of TCM are exploring evaluation methods suitable for TCM.8 While modern medicine has a well established system of clinical research applying evidence-based methods, traditional Chinese medicine has not developed its own system of research, despite its long history. We suggest the introduction of a new pattern named as ‘Three Steps’ in clinical research of TCM. The first is secondary study of literature; the second is original study; and the third is a methodology study. After a clinical theme is defined, a researcher should search the medical literature to identify all relevant studies. According to the standard approach of EBM, the researcher should appraise the literature firstly and decide whether there is meaningful evidence. If the answer is reliable, evidence from the studies can be combined by means of meta-analysis. If there is no or insufficient evidence, the second step is to design and conduct a suitable study using high quality methods. On the basis of this second step, it is possible that some new methodology might emerge. Randomized controlled trials have already been conducted in TCM. However, with the emerging of Circular Model,9 people begin to scan the hierarchy model again which emphasizes internal validity and experimental evidence. The circle method has no preferred orientation with the contrast of the hierarchy method. It might be a more fitting image for clinical research by balancing the weaknesses of one method with the strengths of another. Chinese medicine is indeed different from western medicine, while TCM is an individual therapeutic method for diseases or conditions. The basic principles for evaluation are similar to western medicine although the special features in TCM should be highlighted. We also should consider the current possibilities for reporting the details of TCM studies. There should be a balance between what is ideal and what is feasible. If the aim of a clinical trail is to evaluate the efficacy of treatment of a disease or symptom with TCM, the inclusion criteria should be internationally or nationally recognized and the criteria should be included. If the aim of a particular Chinese medicine is only to treat specific TCM symptoms it is important to report the TCM diagnostic criteria and this should also be related to the aim of the treatment. If the aim is to treat a disease or symptom, outcome measures should be patient related and internationally or nationally recognized. If the aim of a Chinese medicine is only to improve specific TCM symptom, it is necessary to report TCM outcome measures. The best evidence which should be systematically evaluated, reviewed, summarized, and disseminated should lead to evidence based decision making instead of experience based decision making in traditional Chinese medicine.

Inspiration of Guidelines for Randomized Controlled Trials Applied in Surgery on Chinese Medicine Evidence Based Practice and Scientific Research

Design, Conduct, and Analysis of Surgical Randomized Controlled Trials

The Methodological Quality of Surgical Randomized Controlled Trials: A Cross-Sectional Systemic Review.

Pilot and feasibility trials in traditional Chinese medicine: a literature review of current practice

Characteristics, Results, and Reporting of Contemporary Surgical Trials: A Systematic Review and Analysis

New Trends for Clinical Research of Traditional Chinese Medicine in China

Problems and Strategies in Developing Chinese Medicine Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

Review of Randomised Controlled Trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine.

Current Status and Evaluation of Randomized Clinical Trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine in the Treatment of Cardiovascular Diseases

Standards of Surgical Clinical Researches: Introduction of IDEAL Framework

Quality assessment of reporting of randomization, allocation concealment, and blinding in traditional chinese medicine RCTs: A review of 3159 RCTs identified from 260 systematic reviews

ASPIRE Guidelines and Their Enlightenment on Application of Sham Acupuncture in Clinical Researches

Survey and practice of reporting quality of randomized controlled clinical trials on traditional Chinese medicine

The Assessment of Scientificalness and Ethic of Placebo-controlled Trials in Traditional Chinese Medicine

Traditional Chinese Medicine in Cancer Care: An Overview of 5834 Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Chinese

Internal Validity of Randomized Controlled Trials Reported in Major Gastrointestinal and Surgical Endoscopy Journals in 2008

Clinical Research Report on Traditional Chinese patent medicines and Traditional Chinese Classic Famous Prescriptions (2022)

Clinical Trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine in China: Status and Evaluation

Thoughts and strategies on ethical issues in clinical research of surgery

Toward Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine: Status Quo, Opportunities and Challenges

Literature review on control interventions in randomized clinical trials on acupuncture published in mainland Chinese biomedical journals