An Evaluation of Clinical Research Literatures in Core Journals of Traditional Chinese Medicine Integrated with Western Medicine or Traditional Chinese Medicine
李廷谦,毛兵,常静,杨晓楠,王蕾,张颖,夏庆,迟焕海,巫刚,熊泽宇,陈光远,黄宗文,马建昕,王刚,赖珍玉
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-0179.2000.03.002
2000-01-01
Abstract:WT5”BZ]According to the hand-search guideline of Cochrane center,we hand-searched 13 core journals of traditional Chinese medicine integrated western medicine(TCM-WM)or traditional Chinese medicine(TCM)published in recent 20 years.The results showed that there were 32939(36 43%)clinical research articles in a total of 90421 articles of 2315 volumes.In them 3312(10 06%)in the category of RCTs.The number of RCTs in Chinese Journal of TCM-WM was ranked the first position(24 24%),and followed by Journal of Beijing University of TCM,Shanxi Journal of TCM,Liaoning Journal of TCM and Journal of TCM.The lowest was only 4 03%.In early 80's,the adoption of RCTs was all below 5% in these journals,and in creased its ase significantly in 90's.In the year 1995 to 1998,the constitutive ratio of RCTs in Chinese Journal of TCM-WM risen up to the scale of 47 08%,followed by Journal of Beijing University of TCM,Journal of TCM and Liaoning Journal of TCM with the rates of 33 74%,25 78% and 21 75%.The adoption of RCTs in the rest journals was less than 20% in the late 90's,and the lowest was only 7 35% including Shanxi Journal of TCM,Shangdong Journal of TCM,Jiangsu Journal of TCM,Xin Zhongyi,Shanghai Journal of TCM,Zhejiang Journal of TCM,Yunnan Journal of TCM,Sichuan Journal of TCM and Shanxi Journal of TCM.We only found 71(2 14%)randomized double blinded trials.Most of RCTs declared “randomized literally,but without any description of the randomization method,baseline of comparability or oversimpliflation.Most of the RCTs were lack of inclusion or exclusion criteria,some diagnostic and curative criteria,and external observation parameter.Some used nonstandard period of treatment and the contents of samples were too small.Most of the RCTs implemented incorrect statistical method.Thus the results showed limitation in term of prospective ability,randomization,comparability and creditability.The quality most of the RCTs treatises and experience communication pablished in Chinese Journal of TCM-WM had high quahity. [WT5”HZ]