Abstract:Background The reporting of randomised controlled non-inferiority (NI) drug trials is poor with less than 50% of published trials reporting a justification of the NI margin. This is despite the introduction of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) extension on reporting of NI and equivalence in randomised trials. It is critical to set the appropriate NI margin as this choice dictates the conclusions of the trial. Methods to estimate the margin are heterogeneous but generally based on clinical judgement and statistical reasoning, and hence tailored to each clinical situation. Yet an appraisal of NI in clinical trials has not been undertaken. Therefore the aim of this systematic review is to assess the reporting and methodological quality of defining the NI margin. Surgical NI trials have been chosen as our prototype to assess this. Methods We will conduct a systematic review of published randomised controlled trials in abdominal surgery that use an NI design. Key eligibility criteria will be: surgical intervention in at least one trial arm; adult patients and a sample size of 100 or more. Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials will be searched from inception until the date of the search. Identified studies will be assessed for reporting according to the CONSORT recommendations. The outcomes are the description of the methods for defining the NI margin, and the robustness of the NI margin estimation. The latter will be based on simulations using alternative assumptions for model parameters. The results of the simulation will be compared with the trial authors' conclusions. Anticipated results The review will describe and appraise the design and reporting of surgical NI trials including shortcomings thereof and allow a comparison with pharmaceutical trials. These findings will inform researchers on the appropriate design and pitfalls when conducting surgical randomised controlled trials with an NI design and promote thorough and standardised reporting of study findings. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is not required and any changes to the protocol will be communicated via the registration platform. The final manuscript will be submitted to a journal for publication and the findings will be disseminated through conference presentations to inform researchers and the public.

Design, Conduct, and Analysis of Surgical Randomized Controlled Trials

Characteristics, Results, and Reporting of Contemporary Surgical Trials: A Systematic Review and Analysis

The Methodological Quality of Surgical Randomized Controlled Trials: A Cross-Sectional Systemic Review.

Alternative Randomized Trial Designs in Surgery

Inspiration of Guidelines for Randomized Controlled Trials Applied in Surgery on Chinese Medicine Evidence Based Practice and Scientific Research

Quality of Reporting in Surgical Randomized Clinical Trials.

Design and execution of clinical trials in orthopaedic surgery

Internal Validity of Randomized Controlled Trials Reported in Major Gastrointestinal and Surgical Endoscopy Journals in 2008

Quality of Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Surgical Randomized Clinical Trials.

Completion and Publication Rates of Randomized Controlled Trials in Surgery: an Empirical Study.

Surgical Clinical Trials with Non-Inferiority Design: a Cross-Sectional Bibliometric Analysis

REporting quality of PilOt randomised controlled trials in surgery (REPORTS): a methodological survey protocol

Patient’s Preference and Randomization: New Paradigm of Evidence-based Clinical Research

[How to Perform a Real World Clinical Study of Surgery].

Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials on Laparoscopic Surgery for Treating Colorectal Disease in Three SCI Indexed Journals

Standards of Surgical Clinical Researches: Introduction of IDEAL Framework

Methodological Quality for Systematic Reviews of Adverse Events with Surgical Interventions: a Cross-Sectional Survey.

Defining non-inferiority margins in randomised controlled surgical trials: a protocol for a systematic review

A Feasibility Survey to Inform Trial Design Investigating Surgical Site Infection Prevention in Vascular Surgery

Evidence on Reporting Guidelines for Surgical Technique in Clinical Disciplines: a Scoping Review Protocol

Identifying Competing Interest Disclosures in Systematic Reviews of Surgical Interventions and Devices: a Cross-Sectional Survey