Abstract:PURPOSE:The flattening filter (FF) has traditionally been used to flatten beams or create uniform fields in conformal and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) but reduces the dose rate. Many studies have confirmed improvement in delivery efficiency by removing the FF, also known as flattening filter free (FFF), especially for small field stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT); but it is unclear if large treatment fields still favor the FFF beam. We propose a novel, unified approach to quantify delivery efficiency of the FFF and flattened beams.METHODS:We modeled the FF effect by inverse conical filters and systematically studied delivery efficiency (beam-on time, BOT) by varying the filter thickness, including the FF and FFF mode. We formulated the BOT of different beams for any arbitrary fluence map in linear programming to solve the optimal inverse conical filter that minimizes the BOT. One-dimensional optimal filters of minimum BOT were also derived in closed form for conical fluence to gain insight for arbitrary clinical fluence maps. We evaluated the BOT of the FFF beam and flattened beam for conformal treatment fields of various dimensions ranging from 5 cm × 5 cm to 25 cm × 25 cm. We also analyzed the BOT for 698 clinical IMRT prostate fluence maps of field size 10 cm × 10 cm, 17 head-and-neck fluence maps of field size 15 cm × 15 cm, and additional realistic test data from 90° rotation and up to 40 cm × 40 cm enlargement of these clinical fluence maps, which were all initially generated with flattened beams.RESULTS:The FFF beam minimized the BOT for A field size less than 20 cm in single leaf pair cases and for conformal fields of dimension less than 20 cm × 20 cm. The FFF beam also minimized the BOT for all tested prostate and head-and-neck cases. The median BOT ratios of the FFF beam to the flattened beam were 0.56 and 0.61 for prostate and head-and-neck cases, respectively. The FFF beam minimized the BOT for field size up to 30 cm × 30 cm and had similar BOTs to those of the flattened beam for field size greater than 30 cm × 30 cm in those clinically realistic test data.CONCLUSION:The filter modeling and BOT calculation enable us to quantify delivery efficiency of the FFF beam and flattened beam in a unified approach. The FFF beam minimized the BOT both theoretically and in simulations for all clinically relevant field sizes and fluence maps in IMRT. The results for conformal fields imply that the FFF beam requires less BOT than the flattened beam for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatments. The delivery efficiency consideration favors the FFF beam in intensity-modulated treatments and may eventually lead to removal of the FF in all future linear accelerator head designs.

Comparison between Monte Carlo simulation and measurement of beam quality and output factor with flattened and flattening filter-free of linear accelerator

Absolute dose calibration and output factor simulation for flattened and flattening filter-free Monte Carlo model of 6 MV photon beams

Monte Carlo simulation of 6 MV flattening-filter-free beams in TrueBeam accelerator

Monte Carlo simulation of beam characteristics from small fields based on TrueBeam flattening-filter-free mode

Comparison analysis of energy spectra between flattened and flattening-filter-free Monte Carlo models for photon beam

Mathematic Modeling of the Dose in Water for Calculating Collimator Scatter Factor of Flattening Filter and Flattening Filter Free Megavoltage Photon Beams

Flattened photon beams, an obsolete feature in modern linear accelerators

MCNP simulation of X-ray beam for a 15 MV medical linear accelerator

Development of a Monte Carlo Beam Model for Raster Scanning Proton Beams and Dosimetric Comparison

Optimalizing electron beam parameters of linear accelerator based on Monte Carlo simulation

The Monte Carlo Simulation of Tsinghua Homo-Source Dual-Beam Medical Accelerator

Dosimetric and Biologic Differences in Flattened and Flattening-Filter-Free Beam Treatment Plans

SU‐E‐T‐19: Monte Carlo Simulation of XHA600D 6MV Linear Accelerator

Monte Carlo modeling of HD120 multileaf collimator on Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator for verification of 6X and 6X FFF VMAT SABR treatment plans

Flattening Filter Free in Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) - Theoretical Modeling with Delivery Efficiency Analysis.

Validation and Testing of a Novel Pencil-Beam Model Derived from Monte Carlo Simulations in Carbon-Ion Treatment Planning for Different Scenarios

Electron Beam Therapy Mode Analysis of Medical Linac by BEAM Code

Experimental determination of electron source parameters for accurate Monte Carlo calculation of large field electron therapy

Evaluation of patient-specific quality assurance for fractionated stereotactic treatment plans with 6 and 10MV photon beams in beam-matched linacs

Establishment of a virtual source model of Varian RapidARC linear accelerator with 6 MeV X-ray

Comparative assessment and QA measurement array validation of Monte Carlo and Collapsed Cone dose algorithms for small fields and clinical treatment plans