Abstract:Objective:To observe the effects of transurethral split of the prostate (TUSP) on the urodynamics, the sexual function and the quality of life of benign prostatic hyperplasia.Methods:Eighty patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia admitted to the Deqing People′s Hospital of Zhejiang Province from January 2017 to June 2019 were enrolled into the research objects prospectively. According to the random digits table method, they were divided into group A and group B, with 40 cases in each group. The group A was treated with TUSP, while the group B was treated with bipolar transurethral plasma kinetic prostatectomy (TUPKP). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, bladder irrigation time, urinary catheter indwelling time, hospitalization time of the two groups were compared and surgical effects were evaluated. The changes of hemoglobin (Hb), serum sodium (Na), post-void residual volume (PVR), maximum urinary flow rate (Q max), international prostate symptom score (IPSS) and international index of erectile function score (IIEF-5), the quality of life index (QOL) of 2 groups before and after the operation were measured. Surgical complications were recorded. Results:The operation time, bladder irrigation time, urinary catheter indwelling time and hospital stay in group A were all shorter than that in group B: (15.63 ± 4.17) min vs. (58.79 ± 10.45) min, (6.26 ± 1.17) h vs. (45.51 ± 10.03) h, (3.07 ± 0.68) d vs. (5.67 ± 1.51) d, (3.63 ± 0.43) d vs. (6.08 ± 1.72) d, (18.32 ± 2.79) ml vs. (65.26 ± 20.64) ml, and there were statistical differences ( P<0.05); there were no statistical difference between 2 groups in surgical curative effect grade and Na 1 d after operation ( P>0.05); 1 day after operation, Hb in group A was higher than that in group B: (115.63 ± 9.78) g/L vs. (109.65 ± 8.36) g/L, and there was statistical difference ( P<0.05); PVR, Q max, IPSS, IIEF-5 and QOL 3 and 6 months after surgery were improved in 2 groups ( P<0.05), but the difference between 2 groups was not statistically significant ( P>0.05); the total complication rate in group A was lower than that in group B: 10.00% (4/40) vs. 27.50% (11/40), and there was statistical difference ( P<0.05). Conclusions:TUSP and TUPKP are equally effective in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia, both of which can improve the symptoms of prostatic hyperplasia, improve the quality of life and improve sexual function. But TUSP has less intraoperative bleeding, shorter operation time, faster postoperative recovery, fewer complications, and higher safety.

Applications of syphon system in transurethal resection of prostate

The value of transurethral cylindrical dilatation of the prostate in the treatment of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia

High-risk benign prostatic hyperplasia patients treated with transurethral resection of prostate

A comparative study of two means of simultaneous treatment for benign prostate hyperplasia and bladder stone

[Transurethral Resection of Prostate Perioperative Hypotension]

Bipolar Transurethral Resection in Saline System Versus Traditional Monopolar Resection System in Treating Large-Volume Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Application of transesophageal doppler mornitoring in early diagnosis and treatment of transurethral resection syndrome in patients undergoing transurethral resection prostate

Analysis of risk factors and therapeutic experience for post-operative hypotension after transurethral resection of prostate

Comparison between a transurethral prostate split and transurethral prostate resection for benign prostatic hyperplasia treatment in a small prostate volume: a prospective controlled study

Feasibility and safety of bipolar-plasmakinetic transurethral enucleation and resection of the prostate in day surgery mode

[Application value of ultrasound technology in transurethral enucleation and resection of the prostate]

Study on the efficacy and safety of Transurethral enucleation and resection of the prostate in treatment of IV grade Benign prostatic hyperplasia

Suprapubic Cystostomy Versus Nonsuprapubic Cystostomy During Monopolar Transurethral Resection of Prostate: a Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Trans‐rectovesical Pouch Urethral‐sparing Robotic‐assisted Simple Prostatectomy: A Case Series

An evaluation of transurethral plasma kinetic resection versus transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of symptomatic BPH

Transurethral resection of the prostate as emergency surgery for the treatment of BPH with acute urinary retention

Application of Suprapubic Needle Aspiration of Bladder to Transurethral Bipolar Plasmakinetic Resection of the Prostate

Comparation of the Predictive Value Between Ultrasonography and Urodynamics for the Efficacy of Transurethral Resection of Prostate in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Patients

[Transurethral Plasmakinetic Enucleation of Prostate and Suprapubic Small Cut in the Treatment of High Risk and Senior Patient with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Bladder Stones].

Long-term Outcome of Transurethral Resection of Prostate in Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer and Bladder Outlet Obstruction

Selective transurethral resection of the prostate combined with transurethral incision of the bladder neck for bladder outlet obstruction in patients with small volume benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH): a prospective randomized study