Abstract:Objective:To analyze and compare the imaging characteristics of contrast-enhanced ultrasound(CEUS) and dynamic enhanced magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) for diagnosis of peripheral intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma,aiming to increase the accuracy of diagnostic imaging.Methods:The imaging characteristics of CEUS and dynamic enhanced MRI in 51 patients with peripheral intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma confi rmed by surgical pathology or fi ne needle aspiration biopsy were retrospectively analyzed and compared.Results:Fifty-fi ve lesions in fi fty-one cases were analyzed.On CEUS,the hyperenhancement in arterial phase was seen in all 55 lesions,iso-echo in 8 lesions and hypo-echo in 47 lesions in portal phase,and hypo-echo in all 55 lesions in phase.On enhanced MRI,all 55 lesions displayed the same characteristics as CEUS in arterial phase except 44 lesions continuously displaying hyper-intensity and 11 lesions displaying hypo-intensity in portal and phases.On CEUS,42(76.4%) lesions displayed enhancement,and 13(23.6%) lesions displayed gross enhancement.During the process of enhancement,the pattern of extending inwardly was observed in 40(72.7%) lesions.On dynamic enhanced MRI,40(72.7%) lesions showed the pattern of enhancement,and other 15(27.3%) lesions showed gross enhancement.The features of CEUS were in arterial phase with extending inwardly.A large proportion of the lesions displayed heterogeneous when reaching the peak intensity.The characteristics of dynamic enhanced MRI were similar to CEUS in arterial phase,but a continuous was seen in portal and phases,indicating in late phase.The occurrence rate of characteristic manifestation on CEUS was 70.9%(39/55) according to the standard of fast-in and fast-out and rimlike and/or branch-like enhancement.The occurrence rate of characteristic manifestation on dynamic enhanced MRI was 69.1%(38/55) according to the standard of rim-like enhancement in arterial phase and delayed enhancement in late phase.There was no difference in the occurrence rate of characteristic manifestation between CEUS and dynamic enhanced MRI(P = 1.000).Conclusion:The characteristic manifestations on CEUS and dynamic enhanced MRI for the diagnosis of peripheral intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma display a high diagnostic value.

Analysis of the Characteristics and Diagnostic Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasound in Patients with Primary Liver Cancer

[Application Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography for Assessing the High-Risk Population of Hepatic Malignant Tumor].

Comparative the Clinical Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography, Enhancement CT and MRI for Diagnosing of Liver Lesions.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Improves Diagnosis of Liver Cancer Compared to Liver Enhanced CT.

Comparison of CT and MRI in the Diagnosis of Liver Tumors: A Retrospective Case-Control Analysis

Role of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in The Detection and Diagnosis of Small Primary Liver Cancer

Characterization of focal liver lesions: comparison of MRI and MSCT

Study of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis of Liver Lesions

Characteristics of MRI Three Periods Enhancement of Primary Liver Cancer and Liver Metastatic Carcinoma

Comparison and correlation of CT scan and MRI for focal liver lesion detection and characterization

Comparison of Enhancement Features of Peripheral Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma on Contrastenhanced Ultrasound and Dynamic Enhanced MRI

Imaging diagnosis of the primary gallbladder carcinoma

Clinical application of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for malignant hepatic lesions undetected on conventional ultrasound

Practical Value of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Diagnosing Focal Hepatic Lesions

Study of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in diagnosis of abdominal lesions

The value of three-dimensional ultrasound and color Doppler imaging in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant tumors of the liver

Evaluation of Primary Malignancies of the Liver Using Contrast-Enhanced Sonography: Correlation with Pathology

[Diagnostic Value of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System MRI on Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma].

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus contrast-enhanced MRI for diagnosis of well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma and precancerous lesions

The Value of MRI Combined with AFP, AFP-L3, GP73, and DCP in the Diagnosis of Early Primary Liver Cancer

The Value of Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Enhancement in the Differential Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Combined Hepatocellular Cholangiocarinoma