Abstract:Introduction: For diagnosing malnutrition as an important modifiable risk factor in surgical cancer patients, GLIM criteria offer a standardised diagnostic pathway. Before assessing malnutrition it is suggested to screen for malnutrition with an implemented screening tool, i.e. the NRS-2002. Validated data regarding the applied screening tool and its relevance for predicting outcome parameters in surgical patients is sparse. Methods: 260 patients undergoing major abdominal surgery for cancer were retrospectively analysed. Between January 2017 and December 2019, patients were prospectively screened for malnutrition with the Nutritional Risk Score 2002 (NRS). Irrespective of their screening result malnutrition was assessed with GLIM criteria using CT scan at lumbar level 3 for measuring skeletal muscle mass (GLIM MMCT). Patients with negative screening results (NRS ≤ 2) were analysed regarding their malnutrition assessment and outcome parameters. Results: 34 of 67 patients with NRS ≤ 2, posing no risk for malnutrition, were diagnosed malnourished according to GLIM MMCT (n=34, 50.7%). 19 patients (55.9%) with NRS ≤ 2 and malnutrition according to GLIM had at least one complication, 12 patients (35.3%) had a severe complication (Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥ 3a), in 26.5% re-laparotomy was necessary, re-admission within one month in 20.6% of patients, and length of hospital stay was 18.76 ± 12.66, which was in total worse in outcome compared to the whole study group (n=260). Patients with NRS ≤ 2 but diagnosed malnourished by GLIM were at significant higher risk to develop a severe complication (OR 2.256, 95% CI 1.038 – 4.9095, p=0.036) compared to patients with NRS ≤ 2 but not being diagnosed malnourished. The risk for overall complications was significantly increased in patients with malnutrition diagnosed by the GLIM criteria using MMCT (OR 2.028, 95% CI 1.188-3.463, p= 0,009). Patients screened at risk with NRS ≥ 3 and diagnosed malnourished by GLIM were also at significant higher risk for developing complications (OR 1.728, 95% CI 1.054 – 2.832, p=0.029). Conclusion: GLIM MMCT is suitable for diagnosing malnutrition and estimating postoperative risk in gastrointestinal cancer patients. Nutritional assessment only in patients with NRS > 2 may bear the risk to miss malnourished patients with high risk for poor clinical outcome. In every patient undergoing major cancer surgery regular assessment of nutritional status regardless of screening result should be performed exploiting CT body composition analysis.

NRS 2002 Nutritional Risk Screening and GLIM Step 2 for Diagnosis of Malnutrition (without FFMI Currently)

Correlation Between Components of Malnutrition Diagnosed by Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition Criteria and the Clinical Outcomes in Gastric Cancer Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Application of Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 in China

Two‐step GLIM approach using NRS‐2002 screening tool vs direct GLIM criteria application in hospital malnutrition diagnosis: A cross‐sectional study

Evaluation of Different Screening Tools As the First Step of the GLIM Framework: A Cross-Sectional Study of Chinese Cancer Patients in an Outpatient Setting

Prevalence of Malnutrition Comparing NRS2002, MUST, and PG-SGA with the GLIM Criteria in Adults with Cancer: A Multi-Center Study

Malnutrition screening with Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 prior to assessment as part of GLIM criteria in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery for gastrointestinal cancer

Application of the GLIM Criteria in Patients with Intestinal Insufficiency and Intestinal Failure at Nutritional Risk on Admission

Validity and applicability of the global leadership initiative on malnutrition criteria in non-dialysis patients with chronic kidney disease

Terminology interpretation of nutritional risk screening (NRS 2002-01.017)and malnutrition diagnosis (GLIM-phenotypic criteria 01.028, etiologic criteria 01.029)

Complementarity of nutrition screening with Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria for diagnosing malnutrition in critically ill patients: A comparison study of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 and modified Nutrition Risk in the Critically Ill Score

Rapid Assessment of Malnutrition Based on GLIM Diagnosis in Crohn’s Disease

The potential of machine learning models to identify malnutrition diagnosed by GLIM combined with NRS-2002 in colorectal cancer patients without weight loss information

Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria as a nutrition assessment tool for patients with cancer

Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 for Adult Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The Development of Malnutrition Assessment Criteria and the Analysis of Current Problems

Preliminary investigation on the prevalence of nutritional risk and malnutrition in cancer patients using NRS 2002 and malnutrition diagnosis (GLIM) criteria in a tertiary (A) teaching hospital in Chongqing

Evaluating the Diagnosis of Malnutrition Based on Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) Criteria in Community-Dwelling Older Adults (Singapore Longitudinal Aging Study)

Comparison of three objective nutritional screening tools for identifying GLIM-defined malnutrition in patients with gastric cancer

A review on application of Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria at home and abroad

GLIM‐defined malnutrition in patients with acute abdomen associated with poor prognosis and increased economic burden: A cross‐sectional study