Abstract:Background: The proposal of the global leadership initiative in malnutrition (GLIM) criteria has received great attention from clinicians. The criteria are mainly used in the research environment and have the potential to be widely used in the clinic in the future. However, the prevalence of malnutrition and risk of future malnutrition based on a current diagnosis of malnutrition are worth exploring.Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed from the earliest available date to 1 February 2023. According to the diagnostic criteria of the GLIM, we analysed the prevalence of malnutrition by directly adopting the GLIM criteria for diagnosis without a previous nutritional risk screening (one-step approach) and by adopting the GLIM criteria for diagnosis after a nutritional risk screening (two-step approach). The main outcome was the prevalence of malnutrition based on the one-and two-step approaches. Secondary outcomes were the future risk of malnutrition based on the GLIM diagnosis, including mortality within and beyond 1 year. primary outcomes were pooled using random-effects models, and secondary outcomes are presented as hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).Results: A total of 64 articles were included in the study, including a total of 47,654 adult hospitalized patients and 15,089 malnourished patients based on the GLIM criteria. Malnutrition was diagnosed by the one-step approach in 18 studies and by the two-step approach in 46 studies. The prevalence of malnutrition diagnosed by the one-and two-step approaches was 53% (95% CI, 42%-64%) and 39% (95% CI, 0.35%-0.43%), respectively. The prevalence of malnutrition diagnosed by the GLIM criteria after a nutritional risk screening was quite different; the prevalence of malnutrition diagnosed by the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS2002) GLIM tool was 35% (95% CI, 29%-40%); however, the prevalence of malnutrition diagnosed by the Mini Nutrition Assessment (MNA) GLIM tool was 48% (95% CI, 35%-62%). Among the disease types, the prevalence of malnutrition in cancer patients was 44% (95% CI, 36%-52%), while that in acute and critically ill patients was 44% (95% CI, 33%-56%). The prevalence in patients in internal medicine wards was 40% (95% CI, 34%-45%), while that in patients in surgical wards was 47% (95% CI, 30%-64%). In addition, the mortality risk within 1 year (HR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.95-3.52; I-2 = 77.1%) and beyond 1 year (HR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.70-2.45; I-2 = 59.9%) of patients diagnosed with malnutrition by the GLIM criteria was double that of patients with normal nutrition.Conclusion: The prevalence of malnutrition diagnosed by the GLIM criteria after a nutritional risk screening was significantly lower than the prevalence of malnutrition diagnosed directly by the GLIM criteria. In addition, the mortality risk was significantly greater among malnourished patients assessed by the GLIM criteria.Systematic review registration: identifier CRD42023398454.

A review on application of Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria at home and abroad

Correlation Between Components of Malnutrition Diagnosed by Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition Criteria and the Clinical Outcomes in Gastric Cancer Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Prevalence of Malnutrition Based on Global Leadership Initiative in Malnutrition Criteria for Completeness of Diagnosis and Future Risk of Malnutrition Based on Current Malnutrition Diagnosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria as a nutrition assessment tool for patients with cancer

The Development of Malnutrition Assessment Criteria and the Analysis of Current Problems

The Glim Criteria As an Effective Tool for Nutrition Assessment and Survival Prediction in Elderly Cancer Patients

Good Performance of the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition Criteria for Diagnosing and Classifying Malnutrition in People with Esophageal Cancer Undergoing Esophagectomy.

Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition Criteria as a Nutrition Assessment Tool for Cancer Patients in China: How and What

Rapid Assessment of Malnutrition Based on GLIM Diagnosis in Crohn’s Disease

Criterion validity of the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria for malnutrition diagnosis compared with the Subjective Global Assessment: Results from a large observational study

Application of the GLIM Criteria in Patients with Intestinal Insufficiency and Intestinal Failure at Nutritional Risk on Admission

Three steps of Global Leadership (nutritional field) Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) and fill the diseases name (Chinese version ICD-10 listed) "nutritional risk " and "malnutrition " on front page of discharge medical record for letting big-data to find it to design the DRG contents for China

Prospective validation of the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria for identifying malnutrition in hospitals: A protocol and feasibility pilot study

The Validity of the GLIM Criteria for Malnutrition in Hospitalized Patients with Gastric Cancer

The Predictive Value of GLIM Criteria on Clinical Outcomes and Responses to Nutritional Support in Patients with Neurocritical Illnesses

Evaluation of the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition Criteria Using Different Muscle Mass Indices for Diagnosing Malnutrition and Predicting Survival in Lung Cancer Patients

Validity and applicability of the global leadership initiative on malnutrition criteria in non-dialysis patients with chronic kidney disease

GLIM criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition – A consensus report from the global clinical nutrition community

Predictive validity of the GLIM criteria in treatment outcomes in cancer patients with radiotherapy.

648 APPLICATION OF THE GLOBAL LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE ON MALNUTRITION (GLIM) CRITERIA IN PERIOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF ESOPHAGEAL CANCER PATIENTS

Malnutrition diagnosed by GLIM criteria better predicts long-term outcomes for patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: A prospective multicenter cohort study