Abstract:ObjectiveTo investigate whether Royal Free Hospital Nutritional Prioritizing Tool (RFH-NPT) is more suitable than Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) in nutritional risk screening for patients with liver cirrhosis, as well as the applicability of subjective global assessment (SGA) in the nutritional assessment of patients with liver cirrhosis. MethodsA total of 113 patients with liver cirrhosis who were hospitalized in Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University from August 2020 to June 2021 were enrolled. RFH-NPT and NRS-2002 were used for nutritional risk screening, and SGA was used for nutritional assessment. The results of these tools were compared with the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria, and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for the three tools. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated for each screening tool, and the association between nutritional status and short-term prognosis was analyzed. The independent samples t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison of continuous data between two groups, and the chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical data between two groups. The Spearman correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation of GLIM criteria with NRS2002, RFH-NPT and SGA. ResultsAccording to the GLIM criteria, 69.9% of the patients were diagnosed with malnutrition, and RFH-NPT and NRS2002 screened out that 72.6% and 51.3%, respectively, of the patients had nutritional risk, while SGA assessment showed that 57.5% of the patients had malnutrition. Compared with NRS2002, RFH-NPT had a higher degree of correlation with the GLIM criteria (r=0.764, P＜0.001), higher sensitivity (94.9%) and NPV (871%), and a better predictive value (AUC=0.872, 95% confidence interval ［CI］: 0.786-0.957). Under the GLIM criteria, SGA had good specificity (88.2%) in the diagnosis of malnutrition in patients with liver cirrhosis, with fair sensitivity (77.2%), good correlation (r=0607, P＜0.001), and good predictive value (AUC=0.827, 95%CI: 0.744-0.911). Based on the GLIM criteria, SGA assessment, and RFH-NPT assessment, the patients with nutritional risk or malnutrition tended to have a longer length of hospital stay (Z=-3.301, -2.812, and -3.813, all P＜0.05) and a higher rehospitalization rate (χ2=3.957, 6.922, and 6.766, all P＜0.05). Based on the GLIM criteria and NRS2002 assessment, the patients with nutritional risk or malnutrition had a significant increase in mortality rate within 3 months (χ2=4.511 and 0.776, both P＜0.05). ConclusionUnder the GLIM criteria, RFH-NPT is more suitable than NRS2002 for nutritional risk screening of patients with liver cirrhosis, and SGA also has good applicability in nutritional assessment of patients with liver cirrhosis. In addition, GLIM criteria, SGA, and RFH-NPT are associated with the clinical outcome of patients.

Terminology interpretation of nutritional risk screening (NRS 2002-01.017)and malnutrition diagnosis (GLIM-phenotypic criteria 01.028, etiologic criteria 01.029)

Application of Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 in China

The Development of Malnutrition Assessment Criteria and the Analysis of Current Problems

Three steps of Global Leadership (nutritional field) Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) and fill the diseases name (Chinese version ICD-10 listed) "nutritional risk " and "malnutrition " on front page of discharge medical record for letting big-data to find it to design the DRG contents for China

Prevalence of Malnutrition Comparing NRS2002, MUST, and PG-SGA with the GLIM Criteria in Adults with Cancer: A Multi-Center Study

NRS 2002 Nutritional Risk Screening and GLIM Step 2 for Diagnosis of Malnutrition (without FFMI Currently)

Prevalence of Malnutrition Based on Global Leadership Initiative in Malnutrition Criteria for Completeness of Diagnosis and Future Risk of Malnutrition Based on Current Malnutrition Diagnosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition Criteria as a Nutrition Assessment Tool for Cancer Patients in China: How and What

Application of the GLIM Criteria in Patients with Intestinal Insufficiency and Intestinal Failure at Nutritional Risk on Admission

ESPEN guidelines on definitions and terminology of clinical nutrition

Validity and applicability of the global leadership initiative on malnutrition criteria in non-dialysis patients with chronic kidney disease

Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria as a nutrition assessment tool for patients with cancer

Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 for Adult Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

GLIM criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition – A consensus report from the global clinical nutrition community

Complementarity of nutrition screening with Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria for diagnosing malnutrition in critically ill patients: A comparison study of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 and modified Nutrition Risk in the Critically Ill Score

Applicability of three nutritional screening tools in patients with liver cirrhosis under the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria

Preliminary investigation on the prevalence of nutritional risk and malnutrition in cancer patients using NRS 2002 and malnutrition diagnosis (GLIM) criteria in a tertiary (A) teaching hospital in Chongqing

Comparison of nutritional risk screening with NRS2002 and the GLIM diagnostic criteria for malnutrition in hospitalized patients

Comparison of three common nutritional screening tools with the new European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) criteria for malnutrition among patients with geriatric gastrointestinal cancer: a prospective study in China.

The Predictive Value of GLIM Criteria on Clinical Outcomes and Responses to Nutritional Support in Patients with Neurocritical Illnesses

The malnutrition in AECOPD and its association with unfavorable outcomes by comparing PNI, GNRI with the GLIM criteria: a retrospective cohort study