Abstract:Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): the National Natural Science Foundation of China onbehalf Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital,Zhejiang University,School of Medicine Background Left atrial (LA) and appendage (LAA) dysfunction were associated with increased risk of stroke in atrial fibrillation. However, usefulness of LA and LAA mechanics has not been fully compared. Methods:201 AF patients were prospectively enrolled. 42(20.8%) had previous stroke/TIA. Speckle tracking was used to measure LA and LAA peak postive strain. LA and LAA MD was defined as the SD of time to peak positive strain corrected by the R-R interval. Results:LA MD and LAA MD were independently associated with stroke/TIA. The model based on CHA2DS2-VASc score for discrimination of stroke was significantly improved by adding LA MD or LAA MD (P < 0.01). Diagnostic value of LA MD was better than LAA MD in patients with normal LA volumes, while LAA MD was more useful in patients with LA enlargement.Conclusion:Both LA and LAA mechanics had incremental value over CHA2DS2VASc score. However, priorities of strain assessment depend on patients’ LA volume. Variables Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) p value OR (95% CI) P value Clinical parameters Age 1.09(1.04-1.14) <0.001 1.11(1.04-1.17) 0.001 1.11(1.05-1.17) 0.001 1.11(1.04-1.17) 0.001 BMI 0.988(0.89-1.10) 0.84 1.07(0.92-1.25) 0.40 1.07(0.91-1.25) 0.40 CHA2DS2-VASc score 1.52(1.15-2.00) 0.003 1.08(0.67-1.74) 0.76 1.08(0.65-1.80) 0.77 1.10(0.69-1.76) 0.69 Persistent AF 1.88(0.94-3.74) 0.07 0.75(0.23-2.40) 0.63 0.87(0.27-2.81) 0.82 Therapeutic anticoagulation 0.56(0.28-1.11) 0.10 0.22(0.09-0.57) 0.002 0.23(0.09-0.59) 0.002 0.22(0.09-0.57) 0.002 LA parameters LAEF 0.96(0.94-0.99) 0.002 0.982(0.953-1.01) 0.26 iLAVmin 1.03(1.01-1.05) 0.006 0.98(0.94-1.02) 0.27 LA MD 1.22(1.10-1.36) <0.001 1.16(1.02-1.32) 0.02 1.18(1.03-1.34) 0.02 1.16(1.02-1.32) 0.02 LA GLS 0.935(0.893-0.98) 0.005 1.0(0.953-1.14) 0.36 1.02(0.94-1.12) 0.59 1.02(0.94-1.10) 0.72 LAA parameters LAAEV 0.12(0.02-0.74) 0.02 3.34(0.31-36.06) 0.32 LAA EF 0.98(0.96-1.00) 0.06 1.01(0.98-1.04) 0.65 LAA GLS 0.85(0.77-0.94) 0.001 0.96(0.86-1.07) 0.46 0.97(0.87-1.08) 0.59 0.96(0.87-1.06) 0.44 LAA dense SEC/thrombus 3.12(1.39-6.99) 0.006 2.02(0.75-5.45) 0.167 LAA MD 1.19(1.09-1.29) <0.001 1.19(1.08-1.31) 0.001 1.19(1.08-1.31) 0.001 1.19(1.08-1.31) 0.001 Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses of associations between clinical and echocardiographic covariates with stroke Abstract Figure.

The Predictive Value of Tissue Mitral Annular Displacement on Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus in Patients with Isolated Atrial Fibrillation

Assessment of Left Atrial Appendage Volume and Function Using Real-Time Three-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

Assessment of the association of left atrial appendage volume and function with spontaneous echo contrast using real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

Assessment of Left Atrial Appendage Morphology and Function in Patients with Non-valvular Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation with Different Rhythms Using Real-Time 3D Transesophageal Echocardiography.

Comparison of Left Atrial and Atrial Appendage Mechanics to Stratify the Risk of Left Atrial/atrial Appendage Stasis in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation

Left Atrial Appendage Mechanical Dispersion Assessed by Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography As a Determinant of Left Atrial Appendage Blood Stasis in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

Comparison of Left Atrial and Left Atrial Appendage Mechanics in the Risk Stratification of Stroke in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

The assessment of left atrial and left atrial appendage mechanics in patients with different stages of atrial fibrillation

P1360Association between left atrial appendage dysfunction and thromboembolic risk in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

Association Betweenleft Atrial Appendage Function Assessed by Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography and the Presence Ofleft Atrial Appendage Stasis in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

The Relationship Between Function and Thrombosis Formation of Left Atrium Appendage Assessed by Transesophageal Echocardiography in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

The Study of the Function and Thrombus of Left Atrium Appendage in Patients with Nonvalvalar Atrial Fibrillation by Transesophageal Echocardiography

Predictors of Occurrence of Left Atrium and Left Appendage Thrombosis in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

Identifying Left Atrium and Left Atrial Appendage Prone to Thrombus Formation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Using Statistical Shape Modeling

Use of Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography to Stratify Risk of Atrial Fibrillation-Related Stroke: Comparison of Left Atrial and Atrial Appendage Mechanics

Evaluation of the Factors of Dabigatran Etexilate on the Treatment of Left Atrial Appending Thrombus by Transesophageal Echocardiography

Left Atrial Appendage Mechanical Dispersion Provides Incremental Value for Thromboembolic Risk Stratification over CHA2DS2-VASc Score in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

Multilogistic Analysis on left Atrial Thrombosis in Patients with Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis

Factors associated with left atrial appendage filling defects on early-phase cardiac computed tomography in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a case-control study

Assessment of Left Atrial Appendage Size and Morphology by Enhanced Cardiac Computed Tomography in Patients with Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation

Usefulness of tissue Doppler-derived atrial electromechanical delay for identifying patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation