Abstract:Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): the National Natural Science Foundation of China onbehalf Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital,Zhejiang University,School of Medicine Background Left atrial (LA) and appendage (LAA) dysfunction were associated with increased risk of stroke in atrial fibrillation. However, usefulness of LA and LAA mechanics has not been fully compared. Methods:201 AF patients were prospectively enrolled. 42(20.8%) had previous stroke/TIA. Speckle tracking was used to measure LA and LAA peak postive strain. LA and LAA MD was defined as the SD of time to peak positive strain corrected by the R-R interval. Results:LA MD and LAA MD were independently associated with stroke/TIA. The model based on CHA2DS2-VASc score for discrimination of stroke was significantly improved by adding LA MD or LAA MD (P < 0.01). Diagnostic value of LA MD was better than LAA MD in patients with normal LA volumes, while LAA MD was more useful in patients with LA enlargement.Conclusion:Both LA and LAA mechanics had incremental value over CHA2DS2VASc score. However, priorities of strain assessment depend on patients’ LA volume. Variables Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) p value OR (95% CI) P value Clinical parameters Age 1.09(1.04-1.14) <0.001 1.11(1.04-1.17) 0.001 1.11(1.05-1.17) 0.001 1.11(1.04-1.17) 0.001 BMI 0.988(0.89-1.10) 0.84 1.07(0.92-1.25) 0.40 1.07(0.91-1.25) 0.40 CHA2DS2-VASc score 1.52(1.15-2.00) 0.003 1.08(0.67-1.74) 0.76 1.08(0.65-1.80) 0.77 1.10(0.69-1.76) 0.69 Persistent AF 1.88(0.94-3.74) 0.07 0.75(0.23-2.40) 0.63 0.87(0.27-2.81) 0.82 Therapeutic anticoagulation 0.56(0.28-1.11) 0.10 0.22(0.09-0.57) 0.002 0.23(0.09-0.59) 0.002 0.22(0.09-0.57) 0.002 LA parameters LAEF 0.96(0.94-0.99) 0.002 0.982(0.953-1.01) 0.26 iLAVmin 1.03(1.01-1.05) 0.006 0.98(0.94-1.02) 0.27 LA MD 1.22(1.10-1.36) <0.001 1.16(1.02-1.32) 0.02 1.18(1.03-1.34) 0.02 1.16(1.02-1.32) 0.02 LA GLS 0.935(0.893-0.98) 0.005 1.0(0.953-1.14) 0.36 1.02(0.94-1.12) 0.59 1.02(0.94-1.10) 0.72 LAA parameters LAAEV 0.12(0.02-0.74) 0.02 3.34(0.31-36.06) 0.32 LAA EF 0.98(0.96-1.00) 0.06 1.01(0.98-1.04) 0.65 LAA GLS 0.85(0.77-0.94) 0.001 0.96(0.86-1.07) 0.46 0.97(0.87-1.08) 0.59 0.96(0.87-1.06) 0.44 LAA dense SEC/thrombus 3.12(1.39-6.99) 0.006 2.02(0.75-5.45) 0.167 LAA MD 1.19(1.09-1.29) <0.001 1.19(1.08-1.31) 0.001 1.19(1.08-1.31) 0.001 1.19(1.08-1.31) 0.001 Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses of associations between clinical and echocardiographic covariates with stroke Abstract Figure.

Association Betweenleft Atrial Appendage Function Assessed by Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography and the Presence Ofleft Atrial Appendage Stasis in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Assessment of the association of left atrial appendage volume and function with spontaneous echo contrast using real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

Assessment of Left Atrial Appendage Morphology and Function in Patients with Non-valvular Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation with Different Rhythms Using Real-Time 3D Transesophageal Echocardiography.

Comparison of Left Atrial and Atrial Appendage Mechanics to Stratify the Risk of Left Atrial/atrial Appendage Stasis in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation

Left Atrial Appendage Mechanical Dispersion Assessed by Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography As a Determinant of Left Atrial Appendage Blood Stasis in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

Assessment of Left Atrial Appendage Volume and Function Using Real-Time Three-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

The assessment of left atrial and left atrial appendage mechanics in patients with different stages of atrial fibrillation

Comparison of Left Atrial and Left Atrial Appendage Mechanics in the Risk Stratification of Stroke in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

P1360Association between left atrial appendage dysfunction and thromboembolic risk in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

Use of Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography to Stratify Risk of Atrial Fibrillation-Related Stroke: Comparison of Left Atrial and Atrial Appendage Mechanics

The value of left atrial longitudinal strain in evaluating left atrial appendage spontaneous echo contrast in non-valvular atrial fibrillation

Left Atrial Appendage Mechanical Dispersion Provides Incremental Value for Thromboembolic Risk Stratification over CHA2DS2-VASc Score in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

The Study of the Function and Thrombus of Left Atrium Appendage in Patients with Nonvalvalar Atrial Fibrillation by Transesophageal Echocardiography

Clinical study on influencing factors for left atrial appendage spontaneous echo contrast or thrombosis in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation

Evaluating the novel parameters for assessing the LAA function and thrombus formation with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

The Relationship Between Function and Thrombosis Formation of Left Atrium Appendage Assessed by Transesophageal Echocardiography in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

Abstract 15625: Left Atrial Appendage Volumetric and Functional Assessment Using Cardiac CT-Derived Three-Dimensional Models

Identifying Left Atrium and Left Atrial Appendage Prone to Thrombus Formation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Using Statistical Shape Modeling

Comparison of left atrial and left atrial appendage mechanics in patients with ischaemic strokes of different aetiologies

Assessing Left Atrial Appendage Functions by Transesophageal Echocardiography and Speckle Tracking Imaging to Predict Recurring Atrial Fibrillation Post‐Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation

Correlation between left atrial appendage morphology based on fractal dimension quantification and its hemodynamic parameters in patients with atrial fibrillation