Use of Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography to Stratify Risk of Atrial Fibrillation-Related Stroke: Comparison of Left Atrial and Atrial Appendage Mechanics

Y Mao,Y Yang,C Yu,MM Ma,YH Wang,RH Jiang,CY Jiang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeaa356.088

2021-01-01

European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging

Abstract:Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): the National Natural Science Foundation of China onbehalf Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital,Zhejiang University,School of Medicine Background Left atrial (LA) and appendage (LAA) dysfunction were associated with increased risk of stroke in atrial fibrillation. However, usefulness of LA and LAA mechanics has not been fully compared. Methods:201 AF patients were prospectively enrolled. 42(20.8%) had previous stroke/TIA. Speckle tracking was used to measure LA and LAA peak postive strain. LA and LAA MD was defined as the SD of time to peak positive strain corrected by the R-R interval. Results:LA MD and LAA MD were independently associated with stroke/TIA. The model based on CHA2DS2-VASc score for discrimination of stroke was significantly improved by adding LA MD or LAA MD (P < 0.01). Diagnostic value of LA MD was better than LAA MD in patients with normal LA volumes, while LAA MD was more useful in patients with LA enlargement.Conclusion:Both LA and LAA mechanics had incremental value over CHA2DS2VASc score. However, priorities of strain assessment depend on patients’ LA volume. Variables Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) p value OR (95% CI) P value Clinical parameters Age 1.09(1.04-1.14) <0.001 1.11(1.04-1.17) 0.001 1.11(1.05-1.17) 0.001 1.11(1.04-1.17) 0.001 BMI 0.988(0.89-1.10) 0.84 1.07(0.92-1.25) 0.40 1.07(0.91-1.25) 0.40 CHA2DS2-VASc score 1.52(1.15-2.00) 0.003 1.08(0.67-1.74) 0.76 1.08(0.65-1.80) 0.77 1.10(0.69-1.76) 0.69 Persistent AF 1.88(0.94-3.74) 0.07 0.75(0.23-2.40) 0.63 0.87(0.27-2.81) 0.82 Therapeutic anticoagulation 0.56(0.28-1.11) 0.10 0.22(0.09-0.57) 0.002 0.23(0.09-0.59) 0.002 0.22(0.09-0.57) 0.002 LA parameters LAEF 0.96(0.94-0.99) 0.002 0.982(0.953-1.01) 0.26 iLAVmin 1.03(1.01-1.05) 0.006 0.98(0.94-1.02) 0.27 LA MD 1.22(1.10-1.36) <0.001 1.16(1.02-1.32) 0.02 1.18(1.03-1.34) 0.02 1.16(1.02-1.32) 0.02 LA GLS 0.935(0.893-0.98) 0.005 1.0(0.953-1.14) 0.36 1.02(0.94-1.12) 0.59 1.02(0.94-1.10) 0.72 LAA parameters LAAEV 0.12(0.02-0.74) 0.02 3.34(0.31-36.06) 0.32 LAA EF 0.98(0.96-1.00) 0.06 1.01(0.98-1.04) 0.65 LAA GLS 0.85(0.77-0.94) 0.001 0.96(0.86-1.07) 0.46 0.97(0.87-1.08) 0.59 0.96(0.87-1.06) 0.44 LAA dense SEC/thrombus 3.12(1.39-6.99) 0.006 2.02(0.75-5.45) 0.167 LAA MD 1.19(1.09-1.29) <0.001 1.19(1.08-1.31) 0.001 1.19(1.08-1.31) 0.001 1.19(1.08-1.31) 0.001 Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses of associations between clinical and echocardiographic covariates with stroke Abstract Figure.