Abstract:Objective The widely use of ultrasound elastography has increased the detection rate of breast cancer.It has great advantage of differential diagnosis of breast tumor.Our study is to evaluate and compare the value of the quantitative ultrasound elastography parameters of AR ( area ratio) , ESR ( entire strain ratio) , LSR ( locolized strain ratio) , EFLR( entire fat to lesion ratio) and LFLR( locolized fat to lesion ratio) in the differential diagnosis of breast tumor. Methods 110 patients with 113 breast tumors were collected from Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Region between January 2015 and January 2016 who underwent breast exami-nation.The tumors were divided into two groups according to patholo-gy which acts as gold standard:benign group with 59 lesions and ma-lignant group with 54 lesions.Participants underwent quantitative ul-trasound elastography parameters examination.AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR、LFLR were compared between benign group and malignant group and ROC curve was drawn.Conventional ultrasound and ultrasound elastography parameter are combined to differentiate the benign or malignant lesion.Calculate the various parameters on the accuracy、susceptibility、specificity、positive likelihood ratio、negative likeli-hood ratio of the diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions, and determine the quantitative parameter with the highest accuracy. Results The mean value of AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR and LFLR of malignant lesions were all significantly greater than that of benign le-sions (P=0.000).Compared with the conventional ultrasound, AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR and LFLR have higher AUC in the differentia-tion of benign and malignant breast lesions;AUC of AR and ESR are higher than conventional ultrasound、LSR、EFLR and LFLR( P<0.000).Compared with conventional ultrasound(1.523) alone, conventional ultrasound combined separately with AR、ESR、EFLR and LFLR have higher positive likelihood ratio(11.581、8.272、3.482、2.458、2.100) in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions, so as accuracy、susceptibility、specificity(P<0.000).The AUC of conventional ultrasound combined separately with AR and ESR[0.940(0.890~0.990)、0.941(0.891~0.990)] were higher than conventional ultrasound and conventional ultrasound com-bined separately with LSR、EFLR、LFLR[0.669(0.669~0.768)、0.837(0.759~0.915)、0.763(0.673~0.852)、0.787(0.701~0.874)],so as accuracy、susceptibility、specificity and positive likelihood ratio(P<0.000). Conclusion Quantitative ultrasound elastography may be helpful in differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions, especially combining conventional ultrasound with AR and ESR, which were superior to combining with the other parameters and provide a more objective and credible basis to differenti-ate benign and malignant breast tumors with conventional ultrasound.

Application of Ultrasound Elastography in Differential Diagnosis and Biopsy of Benign and Malignant Tumors of the Liver

[Application Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography for Assessing the High-Risk Population of Hepatic Malignant Tumor].

Application of Ultrasonic Elastography in Preoperative T Staging of Rectal Neoplasm

Value of Scoring by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Combined with Ultrasonic Elastography in Differential Diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 Lesions

The value of three-dimensional ultrasound and color Doppler imaging in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant tumors of the liver

Clinical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus conventional ultrasound in biopsy of focal liver lesions

The Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Guided Biopsy in Hepatic Space-Occupying Lesions

Application of Ultrasound-Guided Automatic Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Breast Tumors

Value of Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Focal Liver Lesions

The differentiation of malignant and benign lesions of the breast by quantitative Ultrasound elastography

Evaluation of the Feasibility of Shear Wave Point Quantification Technology in the Diagnosis of Liver Tumors As Well As Its Impact Factors

Analysis of false negative in malignant liver tumor biopsies―importance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound

Value of Different Parameters of Ultrasound Elastography in the Diagnosis of Breast Lesions

The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in guiding biopsy of hepatic space-occupying lesions

Value of Combined Application of Ultrasonic Elastography and Conventional Ultrasonography in the Differen tial Diagnosis of Breast Lesions

Quantitative Ultrasound Elastography Methods In Focal Liver Lesions Including Hepatocellular Carcinoma From Diagnosis To Prognosis

Application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in extrahepatic biliary ducts lesions

Comparison Of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound And Contrast-Enhanced Helical Ct In The Diagnosis Of High Echo-Level Small Focal Liver Lesions

Preliminary application of dynamic three-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in diagnosis of liver tumor

Ultrasound Elastography for the Evaluation of Lymph Nodes

A Comparative Study of Three Ultrasonic Elastographic Methods for the Differentiation and Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Masses