Comparative study of high frequency ultrasound and neural electrophysiological examination in diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome

Hong ZHANG,Xiaoming HUO,Huaguang QI,Yang YUN,Geng LIU,Qi ZHOU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16245/j.cnki.issn1008-6978.2016.02.010
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the application value of high frequency ultrasound and neural electrophysiological examination in diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome(CTS). Methods High frequency ultrasound and neural electrophysiological examination were performed in 100 patients with unilateral cubital tunnel syndrome (the affected side limb as the CTS group,the contralateral side limb as the control group). The cross-sectional area (CSA) of the elbow ulnar nerve was measured in the two groups by high frequency ultrasound. The motor nerve conduction velocity (MNCV) was measured by neural electrophysiological examination. And pearson correlation between the largest CSA and MNCV was analyzed in CTS group. By taking the surgical results as the gold standard,the accuracy rate in diagnosis of CTS was compared between the two methods. Results The elbow ulnar nerve largest CSA[(0.14±0.05) cm2] in CTS group was higher than that in control group[(0.06±0.01)cm2],there was significant difference(P<0.01).The elbow ulnar nerve MNCV[(28.53±9.52) m/s] in CTS group was lower than that in control group[(56.17±3.18)m/s],there was significant difference(P<0.01). The elbow ulnar nerve largest CSA was negatively correlated with the MNCV (r=-0.80,P<0.01)in CTS group. The accuracy rate of high frequency ultrasound and neural electrophysiological examination in the diagnosis of CTS was 92% and 90%, respectively. Conclusion High frequency ultrasound and neural electrophysiological examination has important value in diagnosis of CTS. Combination of the two methods could provide more reliable evidence for diagnosis and treatment of CTS.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?