Comparison of surveillance methods for cytomegalovirus infection in immunocompromised patients

刘代红,黄晓军,许兰平,郭乃榄,陆道培
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-764X.2005.01.010
2005-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the significance of various methods of cytomegalovirus (CMV) detection in clinical diagnosis of immunocompromised patients.Methods Clinical samples were gathered weekly.Traditional cell culture (CC) was used to isolate the virus.Indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) was used to detect CMV early antigen.Dot-blot hybridization and PCR were used to detect CMV-DNA.ELISA was used to detect CMV-IgM and CMV-IgG.Results CC and IIF were the methods with the best sensitivity which of both were 100%.The following sensitive method was PCR with sensitivity of 75%.CC and IIF was the method with best specificity which were 73.3%.The following specific method was dot-blot hybridization with specificity of 66.7%.The negative predictive values of CC and IIF were 100%,and those of PCR and dot-blot hybridization were 84.4% and 83.3% respectively.During 3 months after transplantation CMV-IgM was negative in the bone marrow transplant recipients.There was no difference for the mean titers of CMV-IgG between CMV antigen-positive and negative group (P0.05).Conclusion All the CC,IIF,dot-blot hybridization and PCR could be used as CMV surveillance methods,and the latter three were less time-consuming.The patients with continuously negative results should be considered as low-risk group for CMV reactivation.CMV-IgM and CMV-IgG are unsuitable for detection of CMV reactivation in immunocompromised patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?