Methodology for Monitoring Cytomegalovirus Infection after Renal Transplantation

Wujun Xue,Hua Liu,Hang Yan,Puxun Tian,Xiaoming Ding,Xiaoming Pan,Xinshun Feng,Heli Xiang,Jun Hou,Xiaoli He

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.2009.033

2009-01-01

Abstract:Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of different detection methods for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after renal transplantation and also to establish a system to monitor therapy for CMV infection.Methods: We retrospectively studied 1516 renal transplant recipients from June 1994 to December 2006. All patients were screened for CMV-DNA. A total of 1402 patients had received CMV-IgG/IgM detection since June 1996 and 660 had received CMV antigen detection since June 2000.Results: A total of 664 (43.8%) recipients developed CMV infection. The sensitivity, specificity and Youden index of the three methods, respectively, were 18.84%, 100% and 0.1884 for ELISA, 91.86%, 82.98% and 0.7484 for PCR, and 88.06%, 96.95% and 0.8501 for the CMV-pp65 antigenemia test. The sensitivity and specificity of the two combined detection methods (CMV-DNA and CMV-pp65) for post-operation CMV infection were 93.49% and 99.06%; the two detection methods had significant dependability (p < 0.05) in diagnosis of CMV infection and in evaluation of therapeutic effect of antiviral drugs.Conclusions: Only ELISA can be used as a screening index in order to distinguish whether the donors or recipients are infected with CMV or not. CMV-pp65 antigenemia can help guide clinical therapy for CMV infection. CMV-pp65 and CMV-PCR combined together provide a more effective method to monitor CMV infection and predict its outcome.