Cessation of Pacing in Super Responders of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

梁义秀,王青青,宿燕岗,秦胜梅,汪菁峰,陈学颖,王蔚,柏瑾,葛均波
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-6638.2016.02.003
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To study changes in clinical symptom,cardiac electoral remodeling,and left ventricular structure and function after cessation of pacing in super responders of cardiac resynchronization therapy(CRT).Methods Super responders were recruited from patients receiving CRT between November 2004 and September 2014 without pacing-dependence,and randomized to ceased-pacing group and continued-pacing group.NYHA class,Minnesota questionnaire(QOL),6 minute walking distance(6 MWD),QRS duration (QRSd),left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV),left ventricular end diastolic volume (LVEDV)and left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF) were recorded and compared between groups after 3 and 6 months.Results Twenty-one super responders were recruited and randomized,with 11 in ceased-pacing group and 10 in continued-pacing group.No statistically significant difference was identified between groups regarding to NYHA class,QOL,6 MWD,QRSd,LVESV,LVEDV and LVEF after 3 months (all P>0.1).No statistically significant difference was identified between groups regarding to NYHA class,QOL,6 MWD,QRSd,LVESV and LVEDV after 6 months(all P>0.05);however,LVEF was significantly lower in ceased-pacing group than that of continued-pacing group(0.05±0.01 vs.0.06±0.01,P=0.04),and LVEF was significantly reduced in ceasedpacing group compared to that at randomization.Conclusion LVEF was significantly reduced in super responders of CRT after 6 months cessation of pacing,with no significant changes in clinical symptoms and left ventricular structure.Even super responders of CRT should receive long-term pacing therapy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?