Comparison of the outcome between patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation and patients retained sinus rhythm after cardiac resynchronization therapy

Yun TIAN,Dong-mei WANG,Wei-wei ZHOU,Hong-yun ZANG,Hai-bo YU,Dong-hong ZHANG,Ya-ling HAN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-6638.2010.06.010
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)in chronic congestive heart failure(CHF) patients who developed new-onset atrial fibrillation(AF) during one year followup after CRT,compared with those patients who retained sinus rhythm (SR). Methods The study population consisted of 54 consecutive patients(42 men and 12 women;age 60. 2 ± 11.4 years)who had an indication for CRT with no history of AF. New-onset AF was defined as atrial high-rate episodes > 180 bpm for more than 10minutes as detected by the device, or as any AF documented on an electrocardiogram or Holter monitoring during follow-up. Patients were assigned to the AF group and to sinus rhythm(SR) group. Clinical and echocardiographic(Echo) evaluation was performed at baseline、 after 6 months and 12 months of biventricular pacing. Results 12(22. 2% )patients developed new-onset AF during one year follow-up. In the SR group,both the clinical and Echo indicators improved significantly after CRT( P < 0. 001 ). And in the AF group, there was also a significant improvement in NYHA functional class and left-ventricular( LV )ejection fraction during oneyear follow-up( P < 0. 001 ), as well as a reduction in LV end-diastolic diameter( P = 0. 017 ) and a raised trend in 6-min walk test( P = 0. 078 ). But there was no changes about the left-atrial(LA) diameter and mitral regurgitation (MR). When compared to the SR group, patients in AF group showed a trend of less LA reverse remodeling( △LA, -0. 1 ±5.3 mm vs. -3. 2 ±5.3 mm,P =0. 057). In logistic regression analysis,MR at baseline (P =0. 046 ,OR =3. 729,95% CI 1.021-13. 613) and the percentage of atrail pacing(AP% ) before AF occurrence were the independent predictors of new-onset AF after CRT( P = 0. 010, OR = 1. 050,95% CI 1. 012-1.089). Conclusion Patients with new-onset persistent AF had unfavorable outcomes after CRT. The severe MR and high AP% were the independent predictors of new-onset AF after CRT.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?