A comparison different rate-control in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation underwent resynchronization therapy

Xiao-hong LI,Wei XU,Wen-qing JI,Hong-song YU,Wen-cheng DI,Rong-fang LAN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-6638.2011.04.003
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the effects of different rate control methods in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) patients with chronic congestive heart failure(CHF) and permanent atrial fibrillation(AF).Methods Patients with CHF and permanent AF were eligible for enrolment after resynchronization. Patients were randomed to medical therapy group and atrio-ventricular junction ablation group after CRT or CRT-D implantation. Improvement of symptom and Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were documented duration follow-up to compare the clinic effects between two groups. Results Twenty-six patients with CHF and permanent AF were eligible for enrolment after resynchronization and were randomized to medical therapy group and atrio-ventricular junction ablation group after CRT or CRT-D implantation( 12 in medical therapy group and 14 in atrio-ventricular junction ablation group). The base-line clinical characteristics were similar in two groups.Reverse remodeling was achieved with cardiac function improved in all patients after resynchronization. Compare with medical therapy group, patients in atrio-ventricular junction ablation group showed more significant reduction of left ventricular end-diastolic dimension [LVEDD, ( 61.0 ± 6. 9 ) mm vs ( 62. 0 ± 7. 8 ) mm, P = 0. 08]and increase of left ventricular ejection fraction( LVEF,0. 41 ±0. 06 vs 0. 35 ±0. 04), P = 0. 04 ). Conclusions CRT improve the LV systolic function in patients with chronic congestive heart failure and permanent atrial fibrillation. Atrio-ventricular junction ablation after resynchronization improved the percentage of effective biventricular pacing and the efficacy of CRT.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?