Abstract:Importance: In patients with left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been the standard therapy for several decades. However, some studies suggest that percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents may be an acceptable alternative. Objective: To compare the long-term safety of PCI with drug-eluting stent vs CABG in patients with LMCA stenosis. Data sources: PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Knowledge, and ScienceDirect databases were searched from December 18, 2001, to February 1, 2017. Inclusion criteria were randomized clinical trial, patients with LMCA stenosis, PCI vs CABG, exclusive use of drug-eluting stents, and clinical follow-up of 3 or more years. Data extraction and synthesis: Trial-level hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were pooled by fixed-effect and random-effects models with inverse variance weighting. Time-to-event individual patient data for the primary end point were reconstructed. Sensitivity analyses according to drug-eluting stent generation and coronary artery disease complexity were performed. Main outcomes and measures: The primary end point was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke at long-term follow-up. Secondary end points included repeat revascularization and a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or repeat revascularization at long-term follow-up. Results: A total of 4 randomized clinical trials were pooled; 4394 patients were included in the analysis. Of these, 3371 (76.7%) were men; pooled mean age was 65.4 years. According to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation, evidence quality with respect to the primary composite end point was high. Percutaneous coronary intervention and CABG were associated with a comparable risk of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke both by fixed-effect (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.90-1.24; P = .48) and random-effects (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.85-1.32; P = .60) analysis. Sensitivity analyses according to low to intermediate Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score (random-effects: HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.74-1.41; P = .89) and drug-eluting stent generation (first generation: HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.68-1.20; P = .49; second generation: HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.82-1.73; P = .36) were consistent. Kaplan-Meier curve reconstruction did not show significant variations over time between the techniques, with a 5-year incidence of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke of 18.3% (319 events) in patients treated with PCI and 16.9% (292 events) in patients treated with CABG. However, repeat revascularization after PCI was increased (HR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.42-2.05; P < .001). Other individual secondary end points did not differ significantly between groups. Finally, pooled estimates of trials with LMCA stenosis tended overall to differ significantly from those of trials with multivessel coronary artery disease without left main LMCA stenosis. Conclusions and relevance: Percutaneous coronary intervention and CABG show comparable safety in patients with LMCA stenosis and low to intermediate-complexity coronary artery disease. However, repeat revascularization is more common after PCI.

Comparison of effect of percutaneous coronary interventional therapy versus coronary artery bypass grafting on unprotected left main coronary artery disease in octogenarians

Clinical Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting vs Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Octogenarians With Coronary Artery Disease.

Long-term Outcome Comparison of Ostial/shaft Lesions in Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Treated by PCI or CABG

Clinical analysis of percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with coronary artery disease

Comparison Of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Graft In Aged Patients With Unprotected Left Main Artery Lesions

Interventional Therapy and Bypass Surgery in Octogenarians with Angina Pectoris

Coronary Stenting of Unprotected Left Main Diseases in Elderly Patients Unsuitable for Coronary Surgery

Effects of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients Aged 70 Years and over with Chronic Total Occlusion Lesions

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Chronic Total Occlusion and Multivessel Disease

Ten-year comparative long-term outcomes of PCI versus CABG in multi-vessel coronary artery disease

Percutaneous intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery in left main coronary artery stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Acute Coronary Syndrome in Octogenarians, Association Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Long-Term Mortality

Observe the Effect of Early Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Octogenarian with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 35,409 Patients Undergoing PCI versus CABG for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Diseases

Clinical Outcome in Octogenarians with Acute Coronary Syndrome after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Clinical characteristics and prognosis of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients older than 75 years old with acute myocardial infarction

A comparison between coronary artery bypass grafting surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease.

Efficacy and Safety of Coronary Intervention Treatment in Elderly Patients with In-Stent Chronic Total Occlusions

Immediate And Long-Term Results Of Coronary Angioplasty In Patients Aged 80 Years And Older

Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Conservative Treatment in Unstable Angina Pectoris