Comparison of clinical outcomes between arthroscopic single-bundle and double-bundle individually anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions

Kang CHEN,Weimin ZHU,Wei LU,Yangkan OU,Liangquan PENG,Haifeng LIU,Hao LI,Wenzhe FENG,Ying LI,Jiaming CUI,Daping WANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-9958.2016.06-09
2016-01-01
Abstract:Background:Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is one of the most common knee injuries. Due to the unsatisfactory outcomes of conservative treatment for ACL injuries, reconstruction surgery remains the treatment of choice in most young patients who want to maintain an active lifestyle. Objective:To investigate the clinical outcome of sin-gle-bundle versus double-bundle individually anatomic ACL reconstructions. Methods:Totally 720 patients undergoing ar-throscopic ACL anatomic reconstruction from October 2009 to May 2013 were enrolled in this retrospective study. They were assigned to single-bundle group (n=440) and double-bundle group (n=280) according to surgical procedures. Ham-string tendon autograft was used in all the patients. Femoral Endobutton was used to fix the graft at the femoral site. Tibial-Intrafix was used to fix the graft at the tibial site. Postoperative assessment included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm and Tegner scores, Lachman test, pivot shift test and KT-3000 measurement. Results:The mean duration of follow-up was (24.21 ± 1.73) months in all the 720 patients. The IKDC, Lysholm and Tegner scores were significantly improved after surgery in both groups, but no significant difference was found between groups (P>0.05). Conclusions:The results of KT-3000, Lachman test and pivot shift test and the scores of IKDC, Lysholm and Tegner in dou-ble-bundle ACL reconstruction are not significantly different from those in single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Both single-bundle and double-bundle ACL reconstructions with hamstring tendon autograft can restore the knee stability and functional outcomes well and achieve satisfactory short-term clinical outcome.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?