Measurement of bone mineral density of the proximal femur with quantitative computed tomography and its role of assessment before the surgical treatment of fractures

Jie WEI,Chen YI,Man-yi WANG,Jun WANG,Yu-fu ZHANG,Ming GAO,Yong-bin SU,Ling WANG,Li XU,Xiao-guang CHENG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-252X.2014.11.007
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the potential value of the measurement of the cancellous bone mineral density ( BMD ) of the proximal femur by quantitative computed tomography ( QCT ) in the choice of adequate head screws in the management of proximal femur fractures.Methods A total of 50 patients with femoral neck or intertrochanteric fractures who were adopted from January 2011 to December 2011 were studied as the fracture group, including 23 males and 27 females. Their average age was ( 63.8±16.3 ) years old ( range: 17-94 years ). Other 75 age-sex matched and healthy patients were treated as the healthy group, including 18 males and 57 females. Their average age was ( 61.2±10.4 ) years old ( range: 23-76 years ). The BMD in different regions of interest ( ROI ) of the proximal femur were measured and analyzed by QCT for uninjured sides of the fracture group and bilateral sides of the healthy group.Results The BMD of the femoral head, femoral neck and trochanter in the fracture group were ( 153.0± 37.6 ) mg/cm3, ( 24.9±39.7 ) mg/cm3 and ( 26.6±30.6 ) mg/cm3 respectively, which were obviously lower than ( 220.2± 46.1 ) mg/cm3, ( 74.8±49.1 ) mg/cm3, ( 70.8±41.3 ) mg/cm3 in the healthy group. And the differences between them were statistically signiifcant (P<0.05 ). It was noticed that the decrease of BMD of the femoral head was not parallel with that of the neck and trochanter on average.Conclusions Osteoporosis is a risk factor for proximal femoral fractures, and the BMD of the femoral trochanter sometimes can’t fully relfect that of femoral head. So far, QCT is the only way to assess the BMD of the femoral head. Thus, the preoperative QCT assessment of the BMD of the femoral head is quite helpful in the choice of proper head screws of the implants.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?