Abstract:Abstract Objectives To compare the performance of areal Hounsfield units (aHUs), volumetric Hounsfield units (vHUs), and volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) by quantitative CT (QCT) in discriminating vertebral fractures (VFs) risk. Methods We retrospectively included CT scans of the lumbar spine 101 VFs cases (60 women, mean age: 64 ± 4 years; 41 men, mean age: 73 ± 10 years) and sex- and age-matched 101 control subjects (60 women, mean age: 64 ± 4 years; 41 men, mean age: 72 ± 7 years). In order to assess the discriminatory capability of aHU, vHU, and vBMD measurements at the L1 and L2 levels in identifying VFs, we conducted binary logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses in men and women. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. Results In both men and women with and without VFs, aHU, vHU, and vBMD were highly correlated with each other (r2 from 0.832 to 0.957, all P < .001). There was a statistically significant difference in aHU, vHU, and vBMD between subjects with and without VFs (P < .001). When age, gender, and BMI were taken into account as covariances and adjusted simultaneously, odds ratios (ORs) for aHU, vHU, and vBMD values, which represent the risk of VFs, were significant (P < .001). Compared with aHU and vHU, vBMD was more strongly associated with VF risk (vBMD: OR, 6.29; 95% CI, 3.83-10.35 vs vHU: OR, 3.64; 95% CI, 2.43-5.46 vs aHU: OR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.79-3.67). In both men and women, further, vBMD had higher values for AUC, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV compared to vHU, with vHU in turn surpassing aHU. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for discriminating VFs using the average aHU, vHU, and vBMD of 2 vertebrae was 0.72, 0.77, and 0.87 in men and 0.76, 0.79, and 0.86 in women. In both men and women, there exist statistically significant differences in the AUC when employing the 3 measurements—namely, aHU, vHU, and vBMD—to discriminate fractures (P < .05). Conclusions The QCT-measured vBMD is more associated with acute VFs than vHU and aHU values of the lumbar spine. Although the use of vHU and aHU values for the diagnosis of osteoporosis and discriminating fracture risk is limited to scanner- and imaging protocol-specific, they have great potential for opportunistic osteoporosis screening, particularly vHU. Advances in knowledge The novelty of this study presents a comparison of the VF discriminative capabilities among aHU, vHU, and vBMD. The vHU values introduced in this study demonstrate a greater capacity to discriminate fractures compared to aHU, presenting an improved clinical choice. Although its discriminatory capability is slightly lower than that of vBMD, it is more convenient to measure and does not require specialized software.

Assessment of volumetric bone mineral density of the femoral neck in postmenopausal women with and without vertebral fractures using quantitative multi-slice CT

Densitometric and geometric measurement of the proximal femur in elderly women with and without osteoporotic vertebral fractures by volumetric quantitative multi-slice CT

The study of bone mineral density and structure in proximal femur by quantitative CT in elderly Chinese women

Study of the types of osteoporotic vertebral fractures and the difference of volumetric BMD detected using QCT

Discrimination of Vertebral Fragility Fracture with Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density Measured by Quantitative Computed Tomography

The Spatial Differences in Bone Mineral Density and Hip Structure Between Low-Energy Femoral Neck and Trochanteric Fractures in Elderly Chinese Using Quantitative Computed Tomography

Quantitative Assessment of Zonal Trabecular Volumetric Bone Mineral Density in Middle-Aged and Elderly Women Using Quantitative Computed Tomography.

Quantitative computed tomography has higher sensitivity detecting critical bone mineral density compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in postmenopausal women and elderly men with osteoporotic fractures: a real-life study

Comparisons of Hounsfield units and volumetric bone density in discriminating vertebral fractures on lumbar CT scans

Comparison of QCT and DXA: Osteoporosis Detection Rates in Postmenopausal Women.

Lack of Periosteal Apposition in the Head and Neck of Femur after Menopause in Chinese Women with High Risk for Hip Fractures — A Cross-Sectional Study with QCT

Comparison of the Spine and Hip Bmd Assessments Derived from Quantitative Computed Tomography

Differences in spine volumetric bone mineral density between grade 1 vertebral fracture and non-fractured participants in the China action on spine and hip status study

Reproducibility of voxel-based measurement of bone mineral density and cortical thickness of the proximal femur

Validation of Quantitative Computed Tomography-Derived Areal Bone Mineral Density with Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry in an Elderly Chinese Population

Research on BMD Measurement of Femoral Neck with No-External Reference Phantom CAD Based on QCT Data

Measurement of bone mineral density of the proximal femur with quantitative computed tomography and its role of assessment before the surgical treatment of fractures

Sex differences in the accuracy of vertebral bone quality score assessing bone density in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion

Spatial Differences in the Distribution of Bone Between Femoral Neck and Trochanteric Fractures

Bone mineral density measurement combined with vertebral fracture assessment increases diagnosis of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women

Performance of calcaneus quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the discrimination of prevalent asymptomatic osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women