Effect of clinical factors on minimally invasive surgical treatment for hydronephrosis in patients with cervical cancer and analysis of efficacy

Hongyi ZHANG,Jie CUI,Jixue GAO,Yi LI,Xiaolong HE,Yalong ZHANG,Ziming WANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2017.04.014
2017-01-01
Journal of Clinical Urology
Abstract:Objective:To study the clinical factors on urinary diversion by percutaneous nephrostomy drainage or ureteral stenting for hydronephrosis in patients with cervical cancer,and compare the difference in efficacy and complications between the two methods.Method:We retrospectively analyzed the data of 93 patients with moderately to severe hydronephrosis from October 2008 to October 2014 in Yan'an University affiliated hospital.Fiftyone patients were performed endoscopic ureteral stent insertion,and other 42 patients underwent ultrasoundguided percutaneous nephrostomy drainage.Result:Both endoscopic ureteral stent insertion and ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrostomy drainage were safe and effective.The success rate of endoscopic ureteral stent insertion was correlated with unilateral hydronephrosis,ureteral obstruction length and performance status.The rate of postoperative complications such as backaches,urinary tract infections and collapse of cortical areas was higher in patients undergoing endoscopic ureteral stent insertion.Conclusion:Both percutaneous nephrostomy and ureteral stenting can improve kidney function of the patients with hydronephrosis caused by cervical cancer.Complication rates are low in these two groups.The success rate of ureteral stenting is significantly associated with unilateral hydronephrosis,ureteral obstruction length ≤3 cm and performance status>scores 60.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?