Abstract:Objective To explore the clinical efficacies of open and laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of adult patients with congenital choledochal cyst.Methods The clinical data of 36 adult patients with congenital choledochal cysts who were admitted to the Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital from February 2008 to February 2015 were retrospectively analyzed.Twenty-four patients underwent common bile duct cyst resection + cholecystectomy +biliojejunal Roux-en-Y anastomosis (open surgery group),12 patients underwent laparoscopic common bile duct cyst resection + cholecystectomy + biliojejunal Roux-en-Y anastomosis (laparoscopy group).The intraoperative conditions,detection indexes and postoperative recovery indexes in the 2 groups were analyzed.The follow-up by regular outpatient examination and telephone interview were done up to March 2015.Non-normal distribution data were described as M(P25,P75).Comparison between groups was analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher exact probability.Measurement data with normal distribution were presented as (x) ± s and analyzed using t test.Count data were evaluated by the ratio and proportion.Results The operation time of the open surgery group and laparoscopy group were 238 minutes (191 minutes,283 minutes) and 270 minutes (225 minutes,326 minutes),with a significant difference between the 2 groups (Z =-1.360,P ＞ 0.05).The volume of intraoperative blood loss in the open surgery group and laparoscopy group were 200 mL (113 mL,363 mL) and 75 mL(50 mL,138 mL),with a significant difference between the 2 groups (Z =-3.377,P ＜0.05).The level of C-reactive protein in the open surgery group and laparoscopy group were 94 mg/L (81 mg/L,104 mg/L) and 29 mg/L (21 mg/L,61 mg/L),with a significant difference between the 2 groups (Z =-4.296,P ＜0.05).The pain scores at postoperative day 3,time to anal exsufflation,time for fluid diet intake and duration of hospital stay of the open surgery group and laparoscopy group were 2.5 ± 0.9,(3.7 ± 1.0) days,(5.0 ± 1.6) days,(10.0 ± 2.7) days and 1.9 ±0.3,(2.6 ± 1.0) days,(3.6 ± 1.6) days,(7.8 ± 2.2) days,respectively,showing significant differences between the 2 groups (t =3.146,3.286,2.450,2.523,P ＜ 0.05).Nine patients in the open surgery group and 3 patients in the laparoscopy group had the complications,with improvement of conditions after symptomatic treatment,showing no significant difference between the 2 groups (P ＞ 0.05).All the 36 patients were followed up for a median time of 36 months (range,1-72 months) with good recovery,without long-term postoperative complications and re-operation.Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of adult patients with congenital choledochal cyst is safe and feasible,with the advantages of less intraoperative bleeding,less surgical trauma,fast recovery compared with open surgery.

Efficacy comparison of laparoscopic choledocholithotomy T-tube drainage versus open surgery for choledo-cholithiasis

The comparative analysis between two methods for minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis

Comparison of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Combined with Intraoperative Endoscopic Sphincterotomy and Laparoscopic Exploration of the Common Bile Duct for Cholecystocholedocholithiasis

Biliary Drainage after Laparoscopic Choledochotomy

Comparison of the Efficacies of Open and Laparoscopic Surgery in the Treatment of Adult Patients with Congenital Choledochal Cyst

Comparison of Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration and Open Common Bile Duct Exploration in Treatment of Common Bile Duct Stones

A comparative study of laparoscopic choledocholithotomy with primary suture and T-tube drainage

Clinical analysis of different laparoscopic treatments for cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis

Effect of Laparoscopy Combined with Choledochoscope for the Treatment of Cholecystolithiasis and Choledocholithiasis

Laparoscopic lithotomy for choledochlothiasis: primary suture of common bile duct versus T-tube drainage

[Primary Duct Closure Versus T-tube Drainage Following Laparoscopic Choledochotomy].

Comparison of primary suture and biliary stent insertion with T-tube drainage after choledochotomy

Randomized controlled study of primary closure versus T-tube drainage after aparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration application in cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis

Evaluation of two common bile duct exploration in patients with cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithlasis

Evaluation and meta analysis of randomly controlled trail primary sature and T tube drainage after laparoscopic choledochotomy with exploration and choledocholithotomy

Clinical Analysis of Cholecystolithiasis and Choledocholithiasis Treated by Laparoscopy Combined with Fibrocholedochoscope

Comparative Study between Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Traditional Open Surgery in Elderly Patients with Choledocholithiasis Complicated with Cholecystolithiasis

The comparative study between primary closure and T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration

Comparison of the therapeutic effects of three minimally invasive approaches for laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with common bile duct exploration-- a 5-year retrospective analysis

Comparative Study of Different Methods in Treatment of Choledocholithiasis

Clinical Analysis of Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration with Free T-tube in the Treatment of Common Bile Duct Stones