The comparative study between primary closure and T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration

BAO Chun-liang,DING You-ming,WANG Bin
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To compare the clinical effect between primary closure and T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.Methods:The clinical data of 78 cases of choledocholithiasis received laparoscopic common bile duct exploration as treatment from Feb.2003 to Feb.2008 were analyzed retrospectively,among which primary closure was used in 35 cases and T-tube drainage was used in 43 cases.The operative time,intraoperative blood loss,normal gastrointestinal activity recovery time,hospital stay after surgery and the incidence of postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.Results:There were no statistical differences in the operative time,intraoperative blood loss and the incidence of postoperative complications between two groups(P>0.05).In primary closure group,the time of gastrointestinal activity recovery and the hospital stay after surgery were shorter than that in T-tube drainage group,the differences between the two groups were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusions:If the indication of primary closure was strictly mastered,the clinical effect of primary closure was better than T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?