Analysis of diagnostic accuracy of different endometrial sampling device for endometrial biopsy

Jiang YANG,Huan LI,Yan HU,Hui DU,Chun WANG,Yunjuan ZHU,Jinlong TANG,Ruifang WU

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13390/j.issn.1672-1861.2017.04.003

2017-01-01

Abstract:Objective To evaluate clinical significance of JUSO and Pipelle endometrial sampling device in diagnosing the endometrial pathology.Method 210 patients presenting endometrial biopsy were enrolled from June,2014 to February,2016 in Peking University Shenzhen Hospital.They were divided into JUSO group (n=l17) and Pipelle (n=93) group by simple randomization.An endometrial biopsy collected by endometrial sampling device was performed before dilation and curettage (D&C).Specimen quality,diagnostic accuracy,operative time and pain index were recorded.Results The satisfaction of JUSO group and its D&C were 86.32％ (n=101) and 91.45 ％(n=107) (P=0.212)respectively,while The satisfaction of Pipelle group and its D&C were 80.65％(n=75) and 89.25 ％(n=83) (P=0.101).And there was no statistical significance between two different endometrial sampling devices (P ＞ 0.05).Diagnosing normal *endometrium,endometrial polyp,endometrial hyperplasia without atypia,endometrial atypia and endometrial carcinomas,there was no statistical significance between JUSO endometrial sampling device and D&C(P ＞ 0.05),the same as Pipelle and D&C,or two different endometrial sampling devices.Sampling time of JUSO and D&C were (3.87 ± 2.30) mins and (10.04 ± 4.98) mins (P=0.000),pain index were 2.24 ± 1.86 and 6.35 ± 2.69 (P=0.000).Sampling time of Pipelle and D&C were (3.54 ± 2.3) mins and (9.84 ± 4.57) mins (P=0.000),and pain index were 2.24 ± 1.86 and 6.35 ± 2.69 (P=0.000).There was no statistical significance of sampling time between different endometrial sampling devices (P=0.830).But pain index of JUSO was higher than Pipelle (P=0.029).Conclusion JUSO and Pipelle endometrial sampling device were superior to D&C when taking endometrial sampling in clinic.