A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Endometrial Sampling Device and Conventional Suction Dilation and Curettage for Endometrial Biopsy

Congrong LIU,JIe LIN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-1861.2009.05.010
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the pathologic diagnosis accuracy and the specimen quality between endometrial sampling device and conventional suction dilation and curettage (DC).Methods All 157 outpatients presenting for the endometrial biopsy were enrolled prospectively. An endometrial biopsy collected by endometrial sampling device was performed before DC. Diagnosis was given by professional pathologists.Results Considering the pathologic diagnosis from the samples obtained by DC as control,pathologic diagnosis accuracy rate by the endometrial sampling device was 89.8% (141/157,P0.05) . Similar results were shown for menstrual phase endometrial evaluation in infertility women group (97.9%,95/97) and for endometrial carcinoma screening in non-symptom postmenopausal women (100%,17/17). However,the sensitivity of endometrial sampling device was significantly lower (P0.05) compared with that by DC in patients with fibroids (69.0%,11/16) and with endometrial hyperplasia (61.5%,17/26). Six endometrial carcinoma cases were successfully diagnosed or suspected by endometrial sampling device. The specimen quality was evaluated in 17 non-symptom postmenopausal women undergoing routine endometrial carcinoma screening and 97 infertility patients undergoing menstrual phase endometrial evaluation. No significant difference was shown between two procedures (P0.05).Conclusions The endometrial sampling device is comparable to DC evaluating menstrual phase endometrial in infertility patients and routine endometrial carcinoma screening in non-symptom postmenopausal women,which it may be a promising device for endometrial sampling in endometrial carcinoma patients,while a negative finding should be caution.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?