Clinical comparative analysis of EP regimen vs sequential IP as the first-line treatment for extensive-disease small cell lung cancer

Lei SHI,Xiaofeng CONG,Lei YANG,Zhi LI,Xiangchun LI,Ziling LIU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11877/j.issn.1672-1535.2017.15.02.20
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective To retrospectively analyze the effect and adverse reactions of etoposide and cisplatin (EP) regi-men versus sequential therapy of irinotecan combined with cisplatin (IP) as the first-line treatment of stable extensive-dis-ease small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC). Method 55 patients primarily diagnosed as ED-SCLC were involved in this study. All of the patients were initially administered with EP for 2 cycles resulting in stable disease. And then the patients were divided as two groups as per different chemotherapy thereafter, in which 25 patients switched to sequential IP regi-men (EP+IP group), while the other 30 patients continued with EP regimen. All the patients completed at least 4 cycles of treatment. Adverse reactions and efficacy were evaluated and compared every 1 and 2 cycles, respectively. Result Of the 55 patients evaluated, EP+IP group had CR 0, PR 17, SD 6, PD 2, with an ORR of 68.0%, and in the EP group, there were CR 0, PR 8, SD 17, PD 5, with ORR being 26.7%, The median PFS was 7.0 months in the EP+IP group and 5.0 months in the EP group, and OS was 16.0 months vs 12.0 months, respectively (P<0.05). Both groups had mainly hemato-logical toxicities and gastrointestinal adverse reactions, while less leukocytopenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in EP+IP than that in EP group (P<0.05), and the incidence of delayed-onset diarrhea (grade 1~2) was higher in EP+IP group than that in EP group, and all were tolerable. There's no report on chemotherapy related death. Conclusion In the extensive-disease small cell lung cancer patients who primarily received first-line EP treatment with stable disease, se-quential IP regimen is more effective than EP regimen, with tolerable adverse reactions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?