Abstract:Question Is the combination of a programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor with etoposide-platinum chemotherapy associated with better tumor response among patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer compared with other first-line treatments? Findings In this systematic review and network meta-analysis of 3 phase 2 and 11 phase 3 randomized clinical trials, which included 4838 patients, the combination of a PD-L1 inhibitor (durvalumab or atezolizumab) with etoposide-platinum regimen was associated with better tumor response and safety than other regimens. Meaning The findings of this study suggest that the PD-L1 inhibitor plus etoposide-platinum regimen may be an optimal first-line treatment for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. Importance Combinations of chemotherapy with immunotherapy or bevacizumab in first-line treatments of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) have been evaluated in various clinical trials. However, it remains unclear what the optimal combination regimen is. Objective To clarify which first-line combination regimen is associated with the best tumor response among patients with ES-SCLC. Data Sources Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science) were systematically searched to extract eligible literature from database inception to December 2019. Study Selection Head-to-head randomized clinical trials on first-line treatments for patients with ES-SCLC were included with outcomes and toxic effects reported, including objective response rate (ORR, involving complete response and partial response), disease control rate (DCR, involving complete response, partial response, and stable disease), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) of grades 3 to 5. Of 199 eligible articles, 14 were included. Data Extraction and Synthesis Data were independently extracted and collected by 2 reviewers based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. Main Outcomes and Measures Main outcomes were OS, PFS, DCR, ORR, and TRAEs of grades 3 to 5. Results A total of 3 phase 2 and 11 phase 3 randomized clinical trials involving 4838 patients were included. Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor (durvalumab and atezolizumab) plus etoposide-based chemotherapy, compared with etoposide-based chemotherapy alone, showed the most favorable OS (hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.09-1.80) and the best DCR (odds ratio [OR], 0.42; 95% CI, 0.21-0.81). Bevacizumab plus etoposide-based chemotherapy provided the best PFS compared with etoposide-based chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.09-2.27), although this was not translated into OS benefit. The addition of PD-L1 inhibitors to etoposide-platinum chemotherapy caused no more toxic effects in general (compared with etoposide-based chemotherapy alone: OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.36-2.31), while bevacizumab plus etoposide-platinum regimen induced the most TRAEs grades 3 to 5 among all first-line treatments (eg, compared with irinotecan-platinum regimen: OR, 4.24; 95% CI, 1.26-14.57). Based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve value, PD-L1 inhibitor plus etoposide-platinum had the highest probability of being ranked first for OS (0.87) and DCR (0.97). Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this systematic review and network meta-analysis suggest that the combination of a PD-L1 inhibitor (durvalumab and atezolizumab) and etoposide-based chemotherapy may be an optimal first-line treatment option for patients with ES-SCLC patients. This systematic review and network meta-analysis clarifies which first-line treatment is associated with the best tumor response among patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors versus programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors for the first-line therapy of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: A propensity score-matched study.

Efficacy and Safety of PD-L1 Inhibitors Plus Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone in First-Line Treatment of Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Real-World Study.

First-line immunotherapy plus chemotherapy for ES-SCLC: Comparison between PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in a real-world setting.

Clinical Impact of First-Line PD-1 or PD-L1 Inhibitors Combined with Chemotherapy in Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Real-World Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study.

The efficacy and safety of immunotherapy as first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: evaluating based on reconstructed individual patient data

Delayed addition of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors into chemotherapy on the outcomes for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: A propensity score-matched study.

Efficacy and safety of PD-L1 inhibitors versus PD-1 inhibitors in first-line treatment with chemotherapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer

Which Is More Suitable for First-Line Treatment of Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer, PD-L1 Inhibitors Versus PD-1 Inhibitors? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Comparison of efficacy and safety between PD-1 inhibitors and PD-L1 inhibitors plus platinum-etoposide as first-line treatment for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a multicenter, real-world analysis

P1.04-46 PD-1 Inhibitor Plus Chemotherapy As 2nd/subsequent Line Setting Demonstrate Superior Efficacy over PD-1 Inhibitor Alone in Pts of Advanced NSCLC

JCSE01.26 PD-1 Inhibitor Plus Chemotherapy As 2nd/subsequent Line Setting Demonstrate Superior Efficacy over PD-1 Inhibitor Alone in Pts of Advanced NSCLC

Impact of Clinicopathologic Features on the Efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Patients With Previously Treated Non-small-cell Lung Cancer.

Identifying optimal PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in first-line treatment of patients with advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer in China: Updated systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors Versus Platinum-Based Chemotherapy for the First-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: a Meta Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Combining PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors with chemotherapy is a good strategy for the treatment of extensive small cell lung cancer: A retrospective analysis of clinical studies

Immunotherapy Combined with Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone As the First‐line Treatment of PD‐L1‐negative and Driver‐gene‐negative Advanced Nonsquamous Non‐small‐cell Lung Cancer: an Updated Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis

A Clinical Analysis of Anti-Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatments Combined with Chemotherapy in Untreated Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Efficacy and safety of first-line PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitors in limited-stage small cell lung cancer: a multicenter propensity score matched retrospective study

Comparison of First-Line Treatments for Patients With Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

A multicenter, real‐world study on effectiveness and safety of first‐line modified PD‐1 inhibitors with chemotherapy in advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) with drive gene‐negative

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors plus platinum-etoposide vs. platinum-etoposide in the first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and a meta-analysis