Randomized Phase III Trial of Amrubicin/cisplatin Versus Etoposide/cisplatin As First-Line Treatment for Extensive Small-Cell Lung Cancer.
Yan Sun,Ying Cheng,Xuezhi Hao,Jie Wang,Chengping Hu,Baohui Han,Xiaoqing Liu,Li Zhang,Huiping Wan,Zhongjun Xia,Yunpeng Liu,Wei Li,Mei Hou,Helong Zhang,Qingyu Xiu,Yunzhong Zhu,Jifeng Feng,Shukui Qin,Xiaoyan Luo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2301-6
IF: 4.638
2016-01-01
BMC Cancer
Abstract:7507 Background: Etoposide combined with cisplatin (EP) has been the first-line chemotherapy regimen for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) for >20 years; however, a more effective regimen has been recommended by many clinical oncologists. Thus, we here present our preliminary results of a phase III clinical trial of the novel drug amrubicin in combination with cisplatin (AP) in comparison to EP in patients with previously untreated extensive SCLC (ED-SCLC). Methods: A total of 299 previously untreated ED-SCLC patients were randomized (ratio, 1:1) into two treatment groups: (1) the AP group (n = 149): 4–6 cycles of amrubicin (40 mg/m2/day on days 1–3) and cisplatin (60 mg/m2/day on day 1) and (2) the EP group (n = 150): 4–6 cycles of etoposide (100 mg/m2/day on days 1–3) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2/day on day 1 every 21 days). Patients were evaluated for therapy response and electrocardiography results every 2 cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and general safety. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar among the two groups. For AP and EP groups, the median OS was 11.79 and 10.28 months, the median PFS was 7.13 and 6.37 months, and ORR was 69.8% and 57.3%, respectively. The most frequent adverse events (≥grade 3) in AP and EP groups were bone marrow failure (23.5% and 21.3%, respectively), neutropenia (54.4% and 44.0%, respectively), and leukopenia (34.9% and 19.3%, respectively). Conclusions: Our phase III trial demonstrated that for previously untreated ED-SCLC patients, AP therapy was not inferior to EP therapy in terms of OS and offered predictable and manageable toxicities. Clinical trial information: NCT00660504.