Comparison of Cisplatin-Mitomycin-vinorelbine Versus Cisplatin-Mitomycin-vindesine Regimen for Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: a Report of 83 Patients

XU Nong,CAI Ju-fen,FAN Yun,ZHONG Hai-jun,YU Xin-min
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-467x.2000.12.024
2000-01-01
Chinese Journal of Cancer
Abstract:Objective: The current study was designed to compare effectiveness of mitomycin, vinorelbine and cisplatin(MNP) regimen with mitomycin, vindesine and cisplatin (MVP) regimen,and to evaluate efficacy of two regimens in patients with advanced non small cell lung cancer(NSCLC). Methods: Eighty three patients were enrolled in this study, 40 patients received MNP and 43 patients received MVP. The characteristics of patients were comparable. Results: Objective response rate was observed in 45.0% of patients in the MNP group with 3 complete responders (CRs) and 15 partial responders (PRs),and 32.6% in the MVP group (P=0.06975) with 14 PRs. The median duration of survival was 10.5 months in the MNP group, compared with 8.1 months in the MVP group (P=0.1516). The progression free survival was 8.0 months and 6.8 months in the MNP and MVP group, respectively. The 1 year survival rate was 42.5% and 27.9% in the MNP and MVP group, respectively. The hematologic toxicity was higher in MNP group and neurotoxicity was higher in the MVP group, but no significant difference.Leucopenia was significantly higher in MNP group(P0.05). Conclusion: MNP regimen may result a longer survival duration with a relatively higher response rate than MVP regimen. Its efficacy should be confirmed through a randomized study.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?