Abstract:Abstract Background To retrospectively analyze the accuracy of radiotherapy using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), Styrofoam fixation, and breast bracket fixation in the chest wall target area and supraclavicular lymphatic drainage area (supraclavicular target area) of patients with breast cancer.and compare the setting efficiency and comfort satisfaction. Patients and methods A total of 65 patients with postoperative lymphatic metastasis of breast cancer, including 36 cases of Styrofoam fixation and 29 cases of breast bracket fixation, were recruited from March 2021 to August 2022 and retrospectively analyzed. All the patients underwent CBCT scans weekly, and the setup errors of the chest wall and supraclavicular target volume were compared and recorded. The planning target volume (PTV) margins of the two groups were calculated using the correlation M PTV = 2.5Σ + 0.7σ. The setup time and comfort satisfaction scores of the two groups were recorded and analyzed. The correlations among errors in each direction were analyzed using the Pearson correlation analysis. Results There was a significant difference in the left-right direction (X) axis of the chest wall target area between the Styrofoam and breast bracket groups (1.59 ± 1.47 mm vs. 2.05 ± 1.64 mm, P = 0.012). There were statistical differences in the ventrodorsal direction (Z) and bed angle of the supraclavicular target area, the data were (1.36 ± 1.27 mm vs. 1.75 ± 1.55 mm, P = 0.046; 0.47 ± 0.47° vs. 0.66 ± 0.59°, P = 0.006, respectively). In the X, Y, and Z directions, the respective PTV margins of the two groups in the chest wall target area were 5.01 mm, 5.99 mm, and 5.47 mm in the Styrofoam group, while those in the breast bracket group were 6.10 mm, 6.34 mm, and 6.10 mm, respectively. Moreover, the PTV margins of the supraclavicular target in the three directions were 3.69 mm, 3.86 mm, and 4.28 mm in the Styrofoam group, while those in the breast bracket group were 3.99 mm, 3.72 mm, and 5.45 mm, respectively. The setup time of the two groups was 3.4 ± 1.1 min and 5.5 ± 3.1 min (P = 0.007). The subjective comfort satisfaction scores of the two groups were 27.50 ± 1.24 and 25.44 ± 1.23 (P < 0.001). Conclusions The application of Styrofoam fixation in radiotherapy of breast cancer in the supraclavicular lymph node area has several advantages as compared to breast bracket fixation, including higher positioning accuracy, smaller external expansion boundary, improved work efficiency, and patients’ comfort, which might provide a reference for clinical work.

Comparison of Setup Variations Between Two Fixation Devices for Radiation after Breast-Conserving Surgery

Companison of Dose Distribution and Setup Error of Two Different Positions and Immobilization Techniques in Breast Cancer Radiotherapy

A dosimetric comparison of the tangential beams IMRT with multifield beams IMRT of the chest wall in postmastectomy breast cancer recurrent patients

Assessment of Setup Error in Orthogonal Megavoltage X-ray Film for Whole Breast Radiation with Breast Bracket Immobilized

Comparison of the Performance of Two Methods to Determine Set-Up Errors for DIBH Patients with Left Sided Breast Cancer in Radiotherapy

Comparativeanalysisofthreekindsoffixedmodesofradiotherapyforthoracictumorpa﹣tients

Dosimetric Benefit of Implanted Marker-Based Cbct Setup for Definitive Prostatic Radiotherapy

A Dosimetric Study of Supine and Prone Treatment Setups for Breast Cancer Patients after Breast Conserving Surgery

Detection of Setup Errors with Body Surface Laser Scanning for Whole Breast Irradiation after Conservative Surgery

SU-E-J-29: Evaluation of Effectiveness of Immobilization Devices for Radiation Therapy with Repeated CBCT Studies

Setup Error Assessment and Correction in Planar kV Image- Versus Cone Beam CT Image-Guided Radiation Therapy: A Clinical Study of Early Breast Cancer Treated With External Beam Partial Breast Irradiation

Impact of treatment set-up errors on accuracy of post-operation radiotherapy in patients with breast cancer

Comparison of Setup Accuracy of Optical Surface Image Versus Orthogonal X-Ray Images for VMAT of the Left Breast Using Deep-Inspiration Breath-Hold.

Application of optical surface monitoring system(OSMS) during postoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer patients immobilized with neck and thorax thermoplastic mask

A comparision of three imaging modalities in image-guided radiotherapy

Setup margins based on the inter‐ and intrafractional setup error of left‐sided breast cancer radiotherapy using deep inspiration breath‐hold technique (DIBH) and surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT)

A retrospective study on improving the accuracy of radiotherapy for patients with breast cancer with lymph node metastasis using Styrofoam

Does the protocol-required uniform margin around the CTV adequately account for setup inaccuracies in whole breast irradiation?

Comparison of Set-Up Errors Detected by EPID and CBCT Using Two Different Immobilization ;techniques for Patients with Nasopharygeal Carcinoma

Comparative Analysis Ofapplication Value and Setup Error Between Two Setup Methods in Proton and Carbon Ion Therapy for Prostate Cancer

SU-FF-J-39: Image Guided Radiation Therapy: Investigation of Interfraction Setup and External Contour Variation for Prostate IMRT Using CT and MRI